Talk:Victorious
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Victorious article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 6 months |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Text or other creative content from Victorious was copied or moved into Victorious 3.0: Even More Music from the Hit TV Show with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Video from the show possibly in the Creative Commons
editThis video, posted by a verified/checkmarked account called "NickRewind" which i believe is affiliated with Nickelodeon, has a creative commons license. Would this (a screenshot from the video) technically be allowed to be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons/Wikipedia? 𝙨𝙥𝙞𝙙𝙚𝙧-𝙬𝙞𝙣𝙚-𝙗𝙤𝙩𝙩𝙡𝙚(🕷) - (✉) 12:56, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
- I doubt Nickelodeon would release its copyrighted television series content under a free-use license, no matter what the video asserts. Original content created for the video would be OK to use, but unlikely they have the legal permission from Nick to relicence existing Nickelodeon copyrighted works under a free use license even if the channel is owned by Nick itself as claimed. The video is legally using it under fair-use rules. If the original work they extracted exerpts from is still under a restrictive copyright, it is still under that restricted copyright. Geraldo Perez (talk) 15:53, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
Possible revivals
editThere has been talks over the years about revival. It has never ben officially announced yet. Can a section be created about those talks? Cwater1 (talk) 17:39, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- If it is well-sourced in reliable sources and not based on speculation from commentators who have no connection to the production, reports of fan desires, or former cast statements. I doubt there is much we could base a section on that had anything we could use as a reliable source. If there were actually discussions by decision makers in the production team or network about revivals that we could source, we might have enough for a section about it. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:48, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
- makes sense. I do know that Wikipedia is not a fan site of rumors and speculations. Cwater1 (talk) 17:58, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
"The series ended without a proper finale..."
editThere's a sentence in the Production section that starts with those words, with a quote presumably coming from the spinoff series Sam & Cat attributed to Cat that reads What kind of network cancels a show without giving it a proper finale?
A recent edit (which was reverted) changed that to one attributed to Sam, What kind of TV network cancels a big hit?
, which I'll say doesn't exactly fit the context the sentence is presenting. The episode of Sam & Cat alluded to in the sentence is that series' second episode, "#FavoriteShow", which I just watched and couldn't find the Cat quote originally showing in the article – but I could find the Sam quote made in the edit. I might be missing something here and will tag the quote with a citation needed. I'm not sure if the Cat quote ever shows up in any episode of Sam & Cat (definitely not the one I watched), and if it's true that it never shows up, this sentence may need to be updated or removed. I am aware Victorious ended without a proper finale ("Victori-Yes" definitely wasn't), but in supplementing that fact by alluding to something from its spinoff, a proper (existing) quote from the spinoff is needed. MPFitz1968 (talk) 16:06, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
- The exact quote and a reference to the episode name and location time-stamp it appeared in should be there for verification. I believe it adds no value to this article to have that quote in it. It is something a writer put in some other TV series and it is an WP:NOR evaluation, likely correct, they were alluding to this series. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:56, 14 August 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 10 November 2023
editThis edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
76.76.178.122 (talk) 13:57, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Victorious is an American teen sitcom
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. M.Bitton (talk) 14:11, 10 November 2023 (UTC)


