Talk:Utah monolith

Latest comment: 1 month ago by Askarion in topic Source for other examples

Rename?

edit

Over at List of works similar to the 2020 Utah monolith it was pointed out that there are other monoliths in Utah, many holding the common name for a long time. With the cooling of time, does it make sense to add a year to the title here?  SJ + 00:19, 27 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Probably not. The 2020 version received worldwide media coverage and Utah monolith is the WP:COMMONNAME, eg .--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 06:52, 27 April 2021 (UTC)Reply
Call it Utah monolith (2020). When adding year disambiguates we don't go by common name. Personally I think it should be Utah metal monolith which is more descriptive, and disambiguates at the same time, all other monoliths are natural. WP:COMMONNAME says Editors should also consider all five of the criteria for article titles outlined above. Ambiguous or inaccurate names for the article subject, as determined in reliable sources, are often avoided even though they may be more frequently used by reliable sources.. This is precisly the case here. Most of those sources were contemporary to the event, when everyone knew what it meant, but Wikipedia is writing for a 100 year audience, they don't have the context of knowing what "Utah monolith" means. It fails the WP:CRITERIA list of name ("Precision"), it's ambiguous, and by extension fails COMMONNAME per the green quote. -- GreenC 19:47, 24 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

The article title remains ambiguous, per my comments above (green quotes). Some other suggestions include "Monolith meme" or "Utah monolith meme". Or replace meme with "trend". See Category:Internet memes introduced in 2020 and Category:2020s fads and trends which these articles are part of. -- GreenC 15:43, 18 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Source for other examples

edit

The lead says "similar metal columns were erected throughout the world, including elsewhere in North America and countries in Europe, South America and Australia" but this is not sourced/mentioned later in the article. Commander Keane (talk) 12:12, 22 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the catch! The attached Business Insider source mentions California, Europe, and Australia, but not South America, so I've removed it from the lead and also added a sentence under "Similar monoliths" where it belongs. I was able to find a Newsweek source from 2024 that shows the full map (verifying South America and Africa) but I'm not sure where their information is coming from or if it's usable. Askarion 12:27, 22 April 2026 (UTC)Reply