Talk:United States Secret Service

Latest comment: 10 months ago by Matt-Dimension-C136 in topic Agency executives question

National Threat Assessment Center

edit

Shouldn't there be an article, or at least a section within this article, on the NTAC? --Orange Mike | Talk 16:44, 16 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sure, why not? Feel free to write an article, or at least, add a section on it to this page. - wolf 19:45, 16 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Criminal investigation (July 2022)

edit

Propose to add a section to cover specifically the criminal investigation over missing communications records, since it is likely to develop. Factvalue (talk) 21:19, 21 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sourcing needed on "Just Another Rifle"

edit

Looks like the only references I can see for the custom rifles used by CS teams come from the show "The West Wing" or a nebulous RPG game, I'm not sure this is an actual fact. "Uniform Division technicians assigned to the Counter Sniper (CS) team use custom built .300 Winchester Magnum-chambered bolt-action rifles referred to as JARs ("Just Another Rifle")." Poiu477 (talk) 13:45, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

thay trying to delete 2
Nd board member highest national security department al t.v royalty of mind thay for me investigation report 1400 letters against arkansas t serstealing government money thay went after mind i found the intruders from 1970s leave the hiltons alone army G1 secre t service keep changing after so many words your doing now end of pargragh .next before this .
you are trying to ste 4.4.105.162 (talk) 02:11, 20 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Director

edit

Shouldn't Ronald L. Rowe, Jr. be listed as "Acting" Director in the infobox, since he's second in charge? GamerKlim9716 (talk) 14:56, 23 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Ranks

edit

Should we have a section setting out the rank structure in terms? As it stands we have discussion of payscales and career pathways, which uses terms -- "field agent", "journeyman" -- in a way that doesn't make clear if they're formal titles or not. In particular if there's any sort of "rank equivalency" with other agencies -- or indeed their own Uniformed Division, which as that article notes has more standard "police" type ranks -- and there's a suitable source for that, that'd be especially helpful. Otherwise perhaps we should at least note the supervisory titles after "Special Agent" and state explicitly that's the rank structure. 109.255.211.6 (talk) 12:35, 24 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Attacks on... Secret Service protectees?

edit

Given the significance of the assassination attempt on Trump, perhaps we should rescope the "Attacks on..." section to cover everyone with such protection? Wouldn't be a huge increase in volume, and seems equally pertinent to this particular article, as it's about the agency, not the presidency per se. 109.255.211.6 (talk) 05:05, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Founding of Secret Service

edit

Anyone able to clear up the apocryphal story of Lincoln creating the Secret Service on 14 April 1865? The Sec 3 of the appropriations act "approved" July 2, 1864, see: https://www.loc.gov/resource/llsalvol.llsal_013/?sp=381

I can find no historical confirmation of an act by President Lincoln related to creating the Secret Service occurring on 14 April 1865. 69.140.212.142 (talk) 02:53, 13 March 2025 (UTC)Reply

Agency executives question

edit

Would it be appropriate or inappropriate to add the Chief Counsel to the Agency Executives in the InfoBox? I can directly reference them from their profile on the United States Secret Service website. Matt-Dimension-C136 (talk) 03:08, 29 July 2025 (UTC)Reply