Talk:Type 2 diabetes
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Type 2 diabetes article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Type 2 diabetes.
|
 | Type 2 diabetes has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | |||||||||||||
| This  level-5 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Adding link to the section of "hearing loss in diabetes" in the long term complications section
editImproving top-importance medicine articles: Join the Vital Signs campaign 2026
editThe goal of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Vital Signs 2026 campaign is to bring all 101 top-importance articles—including this one—up to at least B-class quality. Many of these articles are widely read but overdue for review, so even small improvements can have a big impact.
If you watch or edit this article, your help would be very welcome. You can:
- Add yourself as a participant
- Note the state of the article in the Progress table (is the current class still correct?)
- Update the article based on recent clinical guidelines and review papers
- Help address gaps, improve clarity for a broad audience, or improve image selection
To reach B class, articles should have: suitable referencing, reasonable coverage, a clear structure, good prose, helpful illustrations, and be understandable to a broad audience. Contributions of any size are appreciated. Femke (talk) 16:00, 20 December 2025 (UTC)
Environmental Endocrine Disruptors (EEDs) as Risk Factors
editA growing body of evidence suggests that exposure to certain chemicals may increase Type 2 diabetes risk, even in people without obesity. These include: Bisphenol A (BPA) Phthalates Persistent organic pollutants (POPs) such as PCBs and dioxins These chemicals may interfere with insulin signaling, pancreatic beta‑cell function, and adipocyte metabolism. This field is sometimes called “diabetogenic environmental toxicology.” ~2026-26270-12 (talk) 23:11, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
- That mechanism would be difficult to prove with high-quality evidence; see WP:MEDASSESS left pyramid, with only observational studies likely achievable, i.e., insufficient as an encyclopedic source. Zefr (talk) 00:23, 30 April 2026 (UTC)