WikiProject iconGreek and Turkish Wikipedians cooperation board
WikiProject iconThis article may be within the scope of Greek and Turkish Wikipedians cooperation board. Please see the project page for more details, to request intervention on the notification board or peruse other tasks.

Polity?

edit

Shouldn’t it be called a “state with limited recognition” like Abkhazia, Taiwan, SADR, or Transnistria? PlebeianTribune (talk) 03:31, 31 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

@PlebeianTribune Abkhazia, Taiwan, SADR and Transistria have a) more recognition, b) they are not occupied territories. Hellenic Rebel (talk) 02:20, 2 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Transnistria (PMR) is not recognized by any UN member states, only the other members of Cis-2. Northern Cyprus (TRNC) is recognized by one UN member state (being Turkey). We could also say unrecognized state.
Calling TRNC an occupied territory but not saying the same thing about a place like Taiwan or Abkhazia (who both rely heavily on foreign support to survive) is not really consistent.
It seems my request has been added. but further discussion is welcome. PlebeianTribune (talk) 17:18, 2 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Look the headings below: "UNSC Resolution 1983/541 is Non-Binding" and "Relevant court cases i) International courts ii) National courts".~2026-23923-9 (talk) 06:17, 12 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
What? This convo ended like a year ago? Also, in cases of States with limited recognition, we typically don’t go by international law, since international law is opposed to places like Somaliland or Transnistria. PlebeianTribune (talk) 06:23, 12 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
SADR is occupied territory, but more like the OPT are occupied territory. (although I'm sure the Moroccan state sees this differently) Slomo666 (talk) 14:55, 4 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
Very late add on but it should be noted that North Cyrpus does appear on the list of states with limited recognition. Every other nation that appears in that entry is defined (except for Taiwan) as a 'partially recognized state'. I think, to be consistent, partially recognized makes more sense.

Arguably, de facto state is worse than the previous occupied territory as it adds ambiguity.Spacefire2 (talk) 04:08, 2 April 2026 (UTC)Reply

A DeFacto State is what it is. You can't claim otherwise. This is unless your claim is that Greece isn't/wasn't militarily succumbed to the loss of the territory, or you lay a claim on their ability to counter via an invasion or annexation Northern Cyprus. Or alternatively, you may consider it to not be a State but rather an occupied territory (it's not). It has its own government and leadership (though independently sovereign, completely backed up by Türkiye militarily) and that will not change. They are in every sense a legitimate operating State now that governs their own territory, with or without international influence, but still continuing to have international relations with various IGBs (International Governing Bodies). ~2026-29043-54 (talk) 14:58, 14 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
In order to become a DeJure State the criteria would need to be expanded (including potential and/or additional recognition from various outside States and organized groups that are internationally recognized). As such, Wikipedia also has their own criteria(s) on the matter. Regarding to, and defining what type of State it is. ~2026-29043-54 (talk) 15:04, 14 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Client state?

edit

Wether it’s a puppet is subjective, but isn’t it at least a client state? Curiousperson2 (talk) 21:02, 25 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

All these terms depend on how you define them. Easier to just say what the relationship is, as we do. CMD (talk) 04:08, 26 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 5 May 2026

edit
 Not done: LLMs should not be used to write Wikipedia content (and ideally not for talkpage posts either). There is a core of something here in the document recognition, but it's going to need much better sources than a direct link to the Hague Convention and one actual advertisement. CMD (talk) 10:59, 5 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Folktales

edit

@KHR FolkMyth, please see our policy on external links. Can the contents of the book be incorporated into the "Culture" section of the article? Also, do you have any kind of a relationship with the authors or the book itself? Alaexis¿question? 15:00, 12 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Alaexis. It's not a book, but an article. On checking the article, I think it can be undone. I checked it and it focuses more on the tales themselves. The theses do delve in the collection aspect and culture behind their collection, though. And no, I'm not related to either of them? KHR FolkMyth (talk) 15:04, 12 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the response. If there is something that is worth including in the culture section feel free to add it citing the article. Alaexis¿question? 09:17, 13 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Update demographics and economic data for 2024

edit

Please update the population and GDP parameters in the infobox and relevant sections with the latest certified official 2024 census data released by the TRNC Statistical Institute.

  • Population (Official 2024 Data): 489,308
  • GDP (Nominal, 2024): 231,983,800,569.4 TL
  • Per capita GDP (2024): $17,498

References: [1]

[2]

Thank you. Jericho.. (talk) 07:11, 27 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. "2024 KKTC Gayri Safi Yurtiçi Hasıla (GSYH) Gerçekleşme Rakamları". TRNC Statistical Institute. Retrieved 2026-05-27.
  2. "İstatistik Kurumu 2024 nüfus verilerini açıkladı: Nüfus 489 bin 308!". Kıbrıs Postası. 2026-02-03. Retrieved 2026-05-27.

unfortunately, I cannot access the first source, and the second does not appear to support the claim. Slomo666 (talk) 18:20, 3 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Chipmunkdavis, please use a response to close requests so requesters know why the request was closed. In this case, the response template:
 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want made. Please detail the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate.
Happy editing, Slomo666 (talk) 14:50, 4 June 2026 (UTC)Reply
It was closed because it had already received a reply disputing the details of the request in a way that a edit request patrolling editor should not action the request. The edit did request a change from X to Y and provide reliable sources, but the support of the source was disputed. Edit requests responders require evidence of consensus in case of a dispute. CMD (talk) 15:00, 4 June 2026 (UTC)Reply