Talk:Trimble Inc.

Latest comment: 3 months ago by STEMinfo in topic Updates to article introduction
edit

This is obviously an advertisement that was pasted here from their website. It uses first person and refers to "our products". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.253.243.247 (talkcontribs) 01:38, 2 August 2007

Instead of pelting it with stones, how about contributing and cleaning it up? It's a stub article, for heaven's sake. QuicksilverT @ 21:49, 7 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Trimble (company). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:36, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Updates to infobox

edit

Hey there! I'm a Trimble employee using the COI edit request system to improve the company's article. I'd like to start by requesting some updates to the infobox:

  • Our current CFO is Phil Sawarynski[1]
  • Revenue: $3.68 billion (2024)
  • Operating income: $461 million (2024)
  • Net income: $1.50 billion (2024)
  • Total assets: $9.49 billion (2024)
  • Total equity: $5.76 billion (2024)
  • Number of employees: 12,100 (2024)[2]

References

  1. "Phil Sawarynski". investor.trimble.com. September 11, 2025. Retrieved September 11, 2025.
  2. "Trimble, Inc. 2024 Annual Report (Form 10-K)". U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. April 18, 2025.

And in the Industries field, I don't have a hard source for this, but would it be possible to get rid of "telecommunications" and "RFID"? Telecommunications is a very small part of our business, and while we use RFID in some of our products, I wouldn't describe us operating within that industry.

OK, that's it from me. If independent editors have questions on any of the above, I'm happy to field them. Thanks! Jeremy at Trimble (talk) 20:12, 12 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

I'm going to ask User:Ptrnext if they wouldn't mind taking a look at this request, since they updated the infobox earlier this year. Jeremy at Trimble (talk) 18:26, 22 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
{{edit COI|A}} = {{edit COI/accepted}} Ynwamerchant22 (talk) 15:28, 3 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Updates to History section

edit

Hello again! With the infobox now updated, I'd like to try to improve this article's History section, which has a few rather large information gaps. I've done some research and put together a more comprehensive History draft that I hope will give readers a better sense of how Trimble has evolved over its near-fifty years of existence. Below there's a Before & After, so that the community can easily see what I've added and revised, and there's a standalone draft, so that editors can examine the full text on its own.

I know that this is quite a long draft and will take a considerable amount of time for other editors to review. If I can speed that process up by answering questions or explaining my thinking, please don't hesitate to reach out! Thanks, Jeremy at Trimble (talk) 20:36, 22 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

I'm going to reach out to User:Ynwamerchant22, who reviewed and implemented my previous request, to see if they've got time to look at this one. No pressure, Ynwamerchant22, but I would appreciate the help! Jeremy at Trimble (talk) 18:38, 31 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
I find it a tad verbose and promotional. Chances are higher of getting accepted if it were more succinct and less cheerful. For example, I'd remove third-party accomplishments enabled by Trimble's products, such as the ones related to the America's Cup, Everest, Challenger, Katrina, or Sichuan. Focus on the "boring" stuff, like mergers and acquisitions, relocations and changes in leadership. Technical accomplishments, such a GPS, OTF, VRS, BIM are useful and can be retained. And try to add more wikilinks to existing articles, re: 3D scanning, GPS tracker, etc. fgnievinski (talk) 18:33, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
I really appreciate the feedback, User:Fgnievinski. I took your advice and cut the passages about third-party applications of Trimble tech. I also made a few other revisions (getting rid of extraneous content, streamlining grammar, etc.) to render the draft a little shorter. And I added in links to technologies that have their own Wiki pages.
The draft is still pretty long, but Trimble's been around for a long time and grown into a rather large company, so I think that makes a certain amount of sense. Of course, your mileage may vary. Anyway, here's my second attempt:
I hope that suffices, but please let me know if you have any further issues with the draft. Again, thanks very much for taking an interest in this! Jeremy at Trimble (talk) 01:26, 25 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the update, I find it acceptable. I'll wait one week for comments from others, feel free to ping me again next week to post the changes. PS: a minor further change is simplifying dates; days are certainly irrelevant and I'd argue so are months. fgnievinski (talk) 23:12, 2 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Hey @Fgnievinski, looks good to me, I'd agree that for simplicity's sake removing dates & months is better, but I'm not totally opposed to them, happy for you to decide on that. Thanks, Encoded  Talk 💬 12:15, 4 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Encoded I think years should be retained. fgnievinski (talk) 14:52, 4 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
Apologies that was a typo! I meant days and months not dates, years certainly should be retained! Thanks, Encoded  Talk 💬 14:59, 4 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Done removed some days, added some missing info, formatted section titles, fixed typo. STEMinfo (talk) 21:36, 8 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Adding a Technology section to the article

edit

Hey again! I thought the article might benefit from some discussion of Trimble's products and services circa now, so I researched and composed an all-new Technology section draft. It's not meant to be exhaustive, and I've been careful not to compose a product catalog or a facsimile of the company website or anything like that. My main goal is to give readers a basic understanding of what the company makes and the industries it serves.

Here's the draft. Review at your leisure by clicking the dropdown:

I'm going to tag in User:Fgnievinski, User:Encoded, and User:STEMinfo, since they all were very helpful in refining the last draft I put forward, but obviously anybody without a COI is welcome to jump in and offer their thoughts. I look forward to hearing from folks! Thanks, Jeremy at Trimble (talk) 22:14, 2 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Ugh, I got as far as the first paragraph. This is why we disallow COI editing in articles. "Supports connected ecosystems" comes across as vapid PR fluff, as does the word "solutions". In fact, we have an essay about exactly that. See WP:SOLUTIONS.
Skimming the rest, you don't need 3 sources to support statements about routine business activity. ~Anachronist (who / me) (talk) 22:44, 2 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Did some digging, Trimble has put promotional content in AEC magazine and sponsored their events before. I dont think we can count them as a independent source. Not too sure about the other sources listed.
@Jeremy at Trimble, a significant portion of the requested changes are currently written in a promotional tone. Please review WP:Neutral point of view and make changes where appropriate. - Otherwise (Talk?) 00:52, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
I'd be suspicious of any trade press or industry publications. They exist to serve the companies they cover, so wouldn't be 100% independent. ~Anachronist (who / me) (talk) 01:44, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Are you opposed to me denying the COI request for NPOV? If not, I'll close it - Otherwise (Talk?) 18:36, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
I'm not opposed to adding a Technology section, but yeah, this proposed one won't work although it does contain some useful information. I'd like Fgnievinski, Encoded, and STEMinfo, who were pinged by Jeremy and are still active as far as I can tell, to chime in and see what can be salvaged, but for now we can close this. ~Anachronist (who / me) (talk) 19:18, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
User:Mustbeotherwise and User:Anachronist: If I could get a word in, before you close the request: Can you provide any specific feedback, in terms of what elements of the draft you find promotional? I'm not against cutting or revising certain things, but I want to know what I should be targeting, so that I can put together something that is informative without straying into marketing/promo territory. Jeremy at Trimble (talk) 19:30, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Like Anachronist said "Supports connected ecosystems" comes across as vapid PR fluff, as does the word "solutions". In fact, we have an essay about exactly that. See WP:SOLUTIONS.
Your proposal doesn't seem to comply with WP:WEIGHT. No mentions of any problems, downsides, competitors, discontinued products, etc.
Phrases like "improve operational efficiency", "unifying and streamlining collaboration," and "enable open, interoperable systems" fall into WP:Marketing buzzspeak and really dont add much information about what the product does.
Also, try your best to use WP:Independent sources and WP:Primary sources and avoid using terms like, "At this time" in favor of one's that wont go out of date like "As of February 2026". - Otherwise (Talk?) 20:49, 3 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Jeremy at Trimble: I took a shot at writing a simple products and services section. Trimble Inc.#Products and services I used the company 10-k, since that's the only place I could easily find with a high level summary of the company's product offerings. Almost none of the sources in the above draft describe the company. There are no products named in my suggested section, so this should be fairly uncontroversial. The only thing that still bothers me is the products named in the lead are not in the article. We can either remove the specific products altogether, or add them to the products and services section, but with good sources. Jeremy - if you want to try to build on what I did, to get more specific about the products, please resubmit an edit request and feel free to ping me. STEMinfo (talk) 23:54, 9 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
User:STEMinfo: Thank you for taking a shot at the section. What you've written is a good simple overview. I just have one adjustment to request for now:
Could you remove the word "software" in the below sentence?
Field Systems - software products for surveying and mapping professionals, civil construction, building construction field services, and positioning systems.
Trimble offers hardware, software and services as part of its field systems segment, not just software. Removing "software" solves this issue. Thanks, Jeremy at Trimble (talk) 20:20, 12 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
Done. ~Anachronist (who / me) (talk) 20:25, 12 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Updating infobox with FY2025 numbers

edit

Hello again! Trimble just released its annual report for FY2025 and so I thought I would offer some newly up-to-date financial numbers for the infobox. According to the 10-K they are as follows:

  • Revenue: $3.59 billion (2025)
  • Operating income: $592 million (2025)
  • Net income: $424 million (2025)
  • Total assets: $9.31 billion (2025)
  • Total equity: $5.84 billion (2025)
  • Number of employees: 11,500 (2025)[1]

Thanks, Jeremy at Trimble (talk) 23:35, 2 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Jeremy at Trimble: Go ahead and make the changes yourself. But I looked up how the numbers are supposed to be formatted for consistency. AI kicked this out:
Within a single infobox (e.g., comparing Revenue and Net Income), use the same scale (all millions or all billions) for consistency. If one figure is $10 billion and another is $500 million, you may choose to write them as US$10,000 million and US$500 million to make them easily comparable.
but I can't find the actual manual of style guidelines on the site. So it's your call. STEMinfo (talk) 07:38, 3 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for approving this, User:STEMinfo. I just took the updates live. I stuck with a mix of billions and millions because that's how it was before and it seems the most legible to me. But other editors are welcome to change it in the future, if they feel strongly about it. Jeremy at Trimble (talk) 21:45, 3 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
@Jeremy at Trimble: I looked again, and your own financial filings use the millions scale for all the numbers. But it's not that big a deal. STEMinfo (talk) 22:51, 3 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Updates to article introduction

edit

Hey there! I've composed a new article introduction that restates important information about the company contained in the History section and the new Products and services one. I've read the site's guidelines on how lead sections should look and hope this aligns:

Trimble Inc. is an American software, hardware, and services technology company that was founded in 1978. Its headquarters is in Westminster, Colorado. It is publicly traded on the Nasdaq and listed on the S&P 500. Trimble develops hardware and software for a variety of business sectors including architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC); surveying, mapping, and geomatics (geospatial); and transportation and logistics (T&L).

I'm going to tag User:STEMinfo, since they expressed concern about the intro in a previous discussion on this Talk page. Other editors are welcome to jump in as well! Thanks, Jeremy at Trimble (talk) 19:47, 9 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

 Done Looks fine. STEMinfo (talk) 23:23, 9 March 2026 (UTC)Reply