Talk:Tiny Jesus/GA1

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Johnson524 (talk · contribs) 00:25, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Reviewer: HistoryTheorist (talk · contribs) 03:14, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

Hey @Johnson524: I am interested in reviewing this article, but it might be a few weeks before I actually do so. I'm super excited, but I'm currently busy right now. ❤HistoryTheorist❤ 03:14, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

Thank you so much for taking up this review! Take all the time you need, cheers! 😄 Johnson524 03:24, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

@HistoryTheorist: Don't forget about me! 🙃 Johnson524 13:19, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

@Johnson524: I won't, I promise! Am planning to do it next Wednesday. Sorry for the long wait! Finals and everything's been catching up to me but my last one's on Tuesday. ❤HistoryTheorist❤ 22:53, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Hey there, I'm not forgetting about you :). Will start formally tomorrow. ❤HistoryTheorist❤ 05:08, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Thank you so much! Johnson524 15:33, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Update: Review will be completed by Sunday the 31st. Thanks for your patience! ❤HistoryTheorist❤ 23:28, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

@Johnson524: thanks for your patience! The review is indeed finished! I did a couple minor copyedits, and once you address the yellow tickmarks, I will pass the article. This article was truly delightful to review and I'm glad you waited for me to finish . ❤HistoryTheorist❤ 05:16, 31 May 2026 (UTC)

actual review

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

source notes

• Y source 10 checks out
• Y Source 3 checks out for the most part, although you should probably replace its first usecase for smiling with his arms outstretched for a different source. It doesn't give a picture of tiny Jesus (unless my browser is blocking something) or explicitly describe it, but other sources seem to indicate that reality.
• Y sources 11 & 12 check out
• Y source 9 checks out
• source 8 checks out, although the website is dead. Thanks for providing an archive link.

 Done Good catch! Johnson524 23:05, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

• Y source 1 checks out
• Y source 2 checks out for the most part, although I could not verify the figurine size as 1 inch from that source; perhaps use source 6?
• Y new source 8 (Bellingham herald) checks out
• Y source 4 checks out
• Y source 5 checks out
• Y source 6 checks out; it's from a HS news site, but I think it's fine because it's reporting on uncontroversial, low-stakes info
• Y source 7 checks out
• Y AGF source 13 checks out from headline, but website refuses to load video at least on my end
• Y AGF paywalled sources

Comment: @HistoryTheorist: Source 2 states that the figurines are a little more than one inch tall, which is referenced in the lead and body of the article as stating the figurines are only about an inch (2.5 cm) tall and slightly over 1 in (25 mm) tall, respectively. Does this help, or is there something else you'd like to see changed? Cheers! Johnson524 22:48, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

nope! I missed that, you're good! Ctrl-F was not being my friend that day, so thanks! ❤HistoryTheorist❤ 05:24, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.