Talk:Time 100
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Time 100 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 6 months |
| This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Include Mistakes section?
editFollowing several deletions and reversions, in the spirit of the BOLD, revert, discuss cycle, let's discuss whether the section I've copied below should be included in the article.
Mistakes
In February 2016, Time included the male British author Evelyn Waugh on its "100 Most Read Female Writers in College Classes" list, generating media attention and concerns regarding fact-checking at the magazine.[1] Time later issued a retraction. In a BBC interview with Justin Webb, Oxford professor Valentine Cunningham said the mistake was "a piece of profound ignorance on the part of Time magazine".[2]
Thank you, SchreiberBike | ⌨ 17:50, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
References
- ↑ "Evelyn Waugh: 'Time' Names Male Writer In List Of '100 Most Read Female Authors'". Inquisitr.com. February 25, 2016. Archived from the original on July 16, 2019. Retrieved July 16, 2019.
- ↑ "Time magazine correction: Evelyn Waugh was not a woman". BBC.com. February 26, 2016. Archived from the original on December 14, 2016. Retrieved June 21, 2018.
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:37, 24 August 2025 (UTC)