 | Tim Bozon was one of the Sports and recreation good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| Current status: Delisted good article | |||||||||||||
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Tim Bozon/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Khazar2 (talk · contribs) 21:38, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
I'll be glad to take this review--sorry you've had to wait so long for one. Initial comments to follow in the next 1-3 days. Thanks in advance for your work on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 21:38, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
Initial comments
editOn first pass, this looks like solid work: well-written, well-sourced, and ripe for promotion. Thanks again for your work on it. I made a few tweaks as I went; feel free to double-check me and revert anything with which you disagree.
Two minor clarity points:
- " His goal total was the most among all WHL rookies" -- that year or all time?
- "his points second and third overall on the Blazers" -- I'm not quite sure I understand how he took both second and third in points--is this second in goals, third in assists?
Checklist
edit| Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Well-written: | ||
 |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | |
|
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | |
| 2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
|
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | |
|
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | |
|
2c. it contains no original research. | |
| 3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
|
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | |
|
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | |
|
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | |
|
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | |
| 6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
 |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | N/A |
|
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | N/A |
|
7. Overall assessment. | Pass |
- Sorry for the delay. I went ahead and fixed up everything here. Any questions of comments just let me know. Kaiser matias (talk) 18:20, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
GA Reassessment
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: No edits to address concerns. Z1720 (talk) 22:50, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
The article fails criteria 3a "addresses the main aspects of the topic"; The "Professional" sub-section of the "Playing career" section has not been updated with any information since September 2020, meaning more 50% of Bozon's professional appearances to date came after the dates covered in the article, and the "International play" section only covers information through the 2019 World Championships, no mention of the 2022, 2023, 2024, or 2025 World Championships that Bozon represented France, again meaning more than 50% of Bozon's international career is not represented in the article. This missing information is important since Bozon's ice hockey career at professional/club and international level is the reason he is notable. Joeykai (talk) 21:25, 9 May 2025 (UTC)