Talk:Through the Valley (The Last of Us)/GA1

Latest comment: 3 months ago by Vestrian24Bio in topic GA review

GA review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Rhain (talk · contribs) 01:00, 9 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Vestrian24Bio (talk · contribs) 14:08, 8 February 2026 (UTC)Reply


Hi! I will be reviewing this article, expect the initial remarks soon! Vestrian24Bio 14:08, 8 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Courtesy ping for Vestrian24Bio. --PresN 20:02, 25 February 2026 (UTC)Reply
will finish this weekend. Vestrian24Bio 02:59, 26 February 2026 (UTC)Reply

Comments

Through the Valley (The Last of Us) (as of this rev)
  • Add |via=YouTube to refs 1, 18 & 27.
  • NYPost (ref 17) is an unreliable source.
  • There ia an unnecessary list markup in the infobox; not sure which but I think it might be the Guest appearances list.
    • The cast list is pretty standard; I believe it was |music=, which used {{ubil}}.
  • No need for refs in image captions, when the matter is covered in adjacent prose.
    • Image captions should be referenced just like any other part of an article per WP:WHYCITE.
  • What's a "previs supervisor" - does previs supposed to be previous or previsual..?
  • Could split the ref 73 to be two separate refs.

(will add more) Vestrian24Bio 09:36, 23 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Vestrian24Bio 10:04, 24 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

@Rhain: that's all I got, ping me when you're done addressing these.. Vestrian24Bio 10:04, 24 March 2026 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the review, Vestrian24Bio! I believe I've addressed all of your concerns; please let me know if there's anything else. Rhain (he/him) 10:09, 24 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Final review

Vestrian24Bio 10:40, 24 March 2026 (UTC)Reply

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.