Talk:Third Militarism/GA1
Latest comment: 28 days ago by Avocadopiu in topic GA review
GA review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Avocadopiu (talk · contribs) 10:56, 24 October 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Borsoka (talk · contribs) 12:52, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
I understand this is your first GA nomination—many congratulations. Please have a look at my comments and suggestions below, and do feel entirely free to disagree with any of them, but I would be grateful if you could explain your reasoning so we can discuss it. Borsoka (talk) 13:11, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Avocadopiu: when do you think you have time to address the pending issues? Borsoka (talk) 09:24, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
- Since I made the nomination in October of last year, I have become much more occupied with school-work. For the summer holidays in June I may be able to resolve everything but that is rather far away. I understand if you would want to stop your GA review for this article. Avocadopiu (talk) 10:01, 30 March 2026 (UTC)
Image review
edit- File:Sanchez Cerro - Arequipa 1930.jpg: could the source be more specific at Commons (for instance, by adding an identifier)?
- File:Luis Miguel Sánchez Cerro.jpg: could the source be more specific at Commons (for instance, by adding an identifier)?
- File:Leticia Perú 1932.jpg: could the source be more specific at Commons (for instance, by adding an identifier)?
- File:Sánchez Cerro - Constitución de 1933.JPG: could the source be more specific at Commons (for instance, by adding an identifier)?
- File:Oscar R Benavides y su gabinete - 1933.jpg: could the source be more specific at Commons (for instance, by adding an identifier)?
- File:Dr. Luis Antonio Eguiguren.jpg: the photo cannot be "own work", could the source be more specific at Commons (for instance, by adding an identifier)?
- File:Urristasfronton.jpg: the photo cannot be "own work", could the source be more specific at Commons (for instance, by adding an identifier)?
- File:Inter american highway Peru document.jpg: could the source be more specific at Commons (author, year of publication, publisher, page)
- File:Antonio Rodriguez Ramirez.jpg: could the source be more specific at Commons (for instance, by adding an identifier)?
Source review
edit- Fix "harv error" at reference 59.
- Either delete the place of publication from all cited books, or add it to each.
- Could you add an identifier (oclc) for Ciccarelli and Pike?
- ISSN is missing at Efrain.
- ISBN is missing at Pons, Peña, Pease, Jiménez.
- When listing the authors at Bibliography, follow ABC order. Borsoka (talk) 13:11, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
- Jimenez is a thesis paper, so hence it does not have an isbn. It does not have as ISSN nor a OCLC. Pena and Pons do not have a ISBN as they are incredibly obscure books outside of Peru, I had access via Wikipedians at various universities. I should be able to find an OCLC however. Pease has been removed as a source as it was not used in the article anyway. Avocadopiu (talk) 14:05, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
- Could not find a OCLC nor ISBN for Pons, if proof of existence is needed, I do have a evidence of the book. Avocadopiu (talk) 14:41, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
- Sorry, but what do you mean by "Identifier" in Wikipedia Commons? Also, this period of history is incredibly obscure like I mentioned before, so hence don't expect many of the images to have much documentation on their origins or when they were taken. Avocadopiu (talk) 15:13, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
- Jimenez is a thesis paper, so hence it does not have an isbn. It does not have as ISSN nor a OCLC. Pena and Pons do not have a ISBN as they are incredibly obscure books outside of Peru, I had access via Wikipedians at various universities. I should be able to find an OCLC however. Pease has been removed as a source as it was not used in the article anyway. Avocadopiu (talk) 14:05, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
- For example, Commons indicates that the Archivo de la Biblioteca Nacional del Perú is the source of “File:Sanchez Cerro – Arequipa 1930.jpg”, but on that basis alone the reliability of the image’s identification cannot be verified. I assume that the archive assigns a specific identifier — such as a reference number — to each item in its holdings. Borsoka (talk) 09:41, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
- I see. An issue is that I cannot access the Archivo de la Biblioteca Nacional del Perú. Maybe it is internet issues on my end but I have had this issue since the start of making the article 7 months ago, I have tried on PC, it has still not worked. I can search my sources for the images. Avocadopiu (talk) 12:48, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
- For example, Commons indicates that the Archivo de la Biblioteca Nacional del Perú is the source of “File:Sanchez Cerro – Arequipa 1930.jpg”, but on that basis alone the reliability of the image’s identification cannot be verified. I assume that the archive assigns a specific identifier — such as a reference number — to each item in its holdings. Borsoka (talk) 09:41, 18 February 2026 (UTC)
Update
edit@Borsoka and Avocadopiu: Is this article ready to be promoted? If not, what needs to be resolved? Z1720 (talk) 17:40, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
- Apologies, I have been extremely busy recently. I will be able to resume the review on Monday or Tuesday. Borsoka (talk) 03:21, 15 May 2026 (UTC)
- I have one more exam untill the June Holidays. Afterwards, I will start editing more. Avocadopiu (talk) 04:05, 15 May 2026 (UTC)
- I have fixed all issues that could be resolved regarding the images. I am unable to access the Archivo de la Biblioteca Nacional del Perú to get reference numbers so I have stated where they can be found in some of the books I used as sources for the article. Urristas Fronton.jpg seems to be found in a printed material but I cannot find its origins other than a Facebook post. Antonio Eguiguren image has no government or printed source I could find, but is also the highest quality image I could find by far. There's an image in Basadre Vol 15, but its significantly lower image quality, around 240px. Let me know which is preferred for a GA article.Avocadopiu (talk) 14:51, 23 May 2026 (UTC)