Talk:The Thing with Feathers (film)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Thing with Feathers (film) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | On 9 October 2025, it was proposed that this article be moved from The Thing with Feathers (film) to The Thing with Feathers. The result of the discussion was not moved and DABified instead. |
Requested move 9 October 2025
editThe result of the move request was: moved. The first proposal will not be moved per WP:NOPRIMARY. However, The Thing with Feathers → The Thing with Feathers (Grimm) per WP:NOPRIMARY to disambiguate both. (closed by non-admin page mover) veko. (user | talk | contribs) [he/him] 19:09, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
- The Thing with Feathers (film) → The Thing with Feathers
- The Thing with Feathers → The Thing with Feathers (Grimm)
– Per pageviews stats, the film is viewed a lot more. I know the potential risks of recent-ism, but I'm unconvinced that the TV episode of Grimm is more popular and would make a huger impact than the film, honestly. George Ho (talk) 18:42, 9 October 2025 (UTC)
- disambiguate both - WP:NOPRIMARY I don't want to see us fully replace a page destination that has such a long history with different content. Disambiguating both is better as a transition step which can be revisited sometime in the future when we see what the average view settle down to in a few years - and I suspect it will continue to be the long term solution. -- Netoholic @ 22:04, 11 October 2025 (UTC)
- disambiguate both Maybe if it had 500k pageviews like If I Had Legs I'd Kick You or Twinless but having recent pageviews just over double the Grimm topic is hardly surprising or indicative of primacy. This could easily change some time after the theatrical release. As Netoholic suggested, it should be revisited then. Until then, this is too recent. Wikinav is not even showing incoming pageviews coming from the Grimm article at all. And the Grimm article has had a hatnote linking to the film since the day before its premiere in January 2025. Οἶδα (talk) 22:10, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
Feedback from New Page Review process
editI left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: This appears to be about a notable topic. However, I wanted to note that new sources are available for use now and would serve well to be added to this article. The critical reception sections could be expanded with them, in particular.