Talk:The Power of the Doctor/GA1
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Sims2aholic8 in topic GA Review
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: TheDoctorWho (talk · contribs) 08:14, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Sims2aholic8 (talk · contribs) 09:08, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
| GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
|---|
|
|
Overall: |
Taking on this review. Will add my comments below over the next day or two. Sims2aholic8 (talk) 09:08, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Sims2aholic8: I've addressed all of your comments bar a few of the redirects per WP:NOTBROKEN, and mainly just because I feel it flows better within the prose. Ready for a source spot check whenever you get around to it!
TheDoctorWho (talk) 21:39, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
- @TheDoctorWho: Thanks for the speedy updates, and for your patience as I got through this review. Totally understand where you're coming from re. NOTBROKEN. Source check now complete. Overall pretty solid, however I have some concerns regarding the use of CultBox and DoctorWhoNews, as well as Twitter/X. Please do let me know if there's something I don't know about these sites that allows them to pass WP:RS, or if you can swap them out for other refs that would be great. Sims2aholic8 (talk) 10:48, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Sims2aholic8: CultBox and DoctorWhoNews were recently determined unreliable as self published sources in discussion on the project talk page. I have replaced all uses of both sources in this article (including ones you didn't mention). ShowBuzzDaily (previously ref 74, now 68) should be okay as another EXPERTSOURCE. The site was run by Mitch Metcalf who was a high-ranking television executive (source to confirm: ). TheDoctorWho (talk) 04:30, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for confirming that, and thank you for finding suitable replacements for the Cultbox and DWN references and tweaking the prose accordingly. Happy to retain the ShowBuzz Daily ref per your EXPERTSOURCE notice. I've checked over all the new refs and happy they all satisfy RS. That covers everything outstanding for the review, and I'm pleased to pass this now for GA. Great work! Sims2aholic8 (talk) 15:47, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Sims2aholic8: CultBox and DoctorWhoNews were recently determined unreliable as self published sources in discussion on the project talk page. I have replaced all uses of both sources in this article (including ones you didn't mention). ShowBuzzDaily (previously ref 74, now 68) should be okay as another EXPERTSOURCE. The site was run by Mitch Metcalf who was a high-ranking television executive (source to confirm: ). TheDoctorWho (talk) 04:30, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- @TheDoctorWho: Thanks for the speedy updates, and for your patience as I got through this review. Totally understand where you're coming from re. NOTBROKEN. Source check now complete. Overall pretty solid, however I have some concerns regarding the use of CultBox and DoctorWhoNews, as well as Twitter/X. Please do let me know if there's something I don't know about these sites that allows them to pass WP:RS, or if you can swap them out for other refs that would be great. Sims2aholic8 (talk) 10:48, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
Lead
edit- Pipe "British Broadcasting Corporation" to BBC
Done - Add a comma before Bishop
Done - assuming this was supposed to be after Bishop rather than before? - Can you explain the use of "reoccurring" for the Cybermen and Daleks? As far as I am aware, "recurring" and "reoccuring" have slightly different meanings, and it feels that the former would be better in this context. I can understand though if you want to avoid repeated use of "recurring" in this paragraph.
Done - Infobox looks good!
- Update piping to Nicholas II, Mel Bush and Doctor Who specials (2022)
Not done - Names in the INfobox credited within the programme
- Update piping to Nicholas II, Mel Bush and Doctor Who specials (2022)
Plot
editWould "bullet train" be better served by being piped to Shinkansen? If the scene is clearly set in Japan then I would say yes, but I will defer to your discretion on this.
Not done - scene takes place in outer space, that link specifically refers to the railway in Japan- I would consider either removing the piping on "Russia" per MOS:OVERLINK, or alternatively changing it so that "1916 Russia" links to Russian Empire
Done - Pipe "Rasputin" to Grigori Rasputin
Done - Another potential OVERLINK on "Naples"
Done
Production
editDevelopment
edit- Images look good!
- Pipe to BBC here as well
Done - Remove piping from "co-executive producer", since "executive producer" is already linked in the same sentence
Done - Either:
- Add piping to the first instance of Cyberman in the plot (as only "CyberMaster" has been piped), and remove the piping to "Cybermen" and "Daleks" here; or:
- Repipe "Cybermen" and "Daleks" to Cyberman and Dalek and add piping to The Master (Doctor Who), which would still be permissible under MOS:REPEATLINK as it is the first section after the plot
Partly done - added a WL to The Master, there are multiple Cybermen and Daleks in the episode hence why the links have been pluralised.
- Remove the apostrophe from "Doctor's"
Done - I would change "its title" to "the episode's title" just to avoid confusion, given that the episode itself hadn't been the subject for a few sentences
Done
Casting
edit- Great use of imagery here!
- Put a comma after "Resurrection of the Daleks"
Done - I think piping on "classic Doctors" would be good, to provide context for anyone not aware of DW history. Not sure where would be the best place to link to though, perhaps somewhere within History of Doctor Who?
- Add piping to Yasmin Khan (Doctor Who), Fugitive Doctor, Kate Lethbridge-Stewart, and Graham O'Brien, as the first mentions outside of the plot (if going with the second option above)
Done - Place Doctor Who Magazine in italics as the title of a work
Done - Repipe to Guinness World Records, place italics only on the "Guinness" and put "world record" in lower case, since in this phrasing the "world record" part is referring to the actual record and not the title of the book
Done
Filming
edit- Image is good
- Fix to Boney M. (missing the full stop here)
Done - Repipe "green screen" to Chroma key
Not done - WP:NOTBROKEN - Repipe to Roath Lock (article title doesn't have the "Studios")
Not done - NOTBORKEN
Release and reception
edit- Infobox looks good
Broadcast and home media
edit- Redirect on Doctor Who: Series 13 – The Specials (soundtrack) needs corrected, as the section title has been changed
Done - Missing a "the" before "Curzon Bloomsbury theatre"
Done - Pipe "CTV Sci-Fi" to CTV Sci-Fi Channel
Not done - NOTBROKEN
Ratings
edit- Pipe to Appreciation Index
Not done - NOTBROKEN
Critical response
edit- Missing a "the" before "Edinburgh TV Festival"; also pipe this to Edinburgh International Television Festival
Done - I think you're missing something at "that Whittaker's "feels bittersweet"."
Done - Add a comma before "although she criticises"; also there's some tense shift here from past to present which needs correcting
Done
Notes
edit- All good here!
References
edit- Copyvio looks good at 19.4%
- Not part of the review, but if you have the time later feel free to check the order of the refs to place them in ascending numerical order (totally optional though)
- Reference spot check:
- 1

- 3
→
content is good, just a bit wary about how reliable this source is (moreso based off of the WordPress logo in the tab); willing to AGF on this though, since it's quoting an article in DWM - 4 and 5

- 10

- 12 and 13

- 16

- 18 and 19

- 25

- 27

- 29

- 34

- 35
→
same issue as above, but also willing to AGF if you believe the source is reliable; also work misspelt as "CutBox" - 38

- 40
→
another CultBox ref - 48
→
same as 3, willing to give AGF since it's quoting DWM - 53

- 61

- 63

- 65

- 69

- 70
would prefer a better source (WP:RSPTWITTER), but since it is from Akinola I'm willing to allow per WP:EXPERTSOURCE - 71/72/73
can you explain how this site doesn't violate WP:RSSELF? - 74
→
this also feels like a WP:RSSELF violation
- 1
External links
edit- Happy with this section too