Talk:Sundae Girl/GA1

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk · contribs) 15:46, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Reviewer: Edward056686 (talk · contribs) 00:02, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

I will review this to fulfill my pledge at Talk:Menches/GA1. Edward056686 (talk) 00:02, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

Content and prose review

• Lead: This could be expanded, it’s very short.
• I expanded it slightly. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 17:21, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
• Publication: This section is very short, it would be good if you could expand them.
  • Unfortunately I have looked and I could not find more information :( DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 17:21, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
• The premise is also a short blurb and could be expanded.
  • I expanded it slightly. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 17:21, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Source spotchecks

• The website listing on BookTrust doesn't seem like a full review and maybe shouldn't be used that way.
  • It may not be a full review but it is still reception as it is the website/organisation's opinion of the novel. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 17:21, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
    • Alright, that's fine. Edward056686 (talk) 18:12, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
• Are the reviews by Awesome Charlie and Ellie-May user generated? They look that way.
  • They are written by users of the website. It was determined in Talk:The Butterfly Club (novel)/GA1 that these reviews are allowed to be used as long as not too much weight are included. DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 17:21, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
    • It looks like the compromise on The Butterfly Club was to lump them together and mention that they were sent in by the website's users. Can you do that here? Edward056686 (talk) 18:12, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

      Done! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 22:58, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

• Reference 15 seems like a good source, can you include any more information from it?
  • I already included all of the information from it :) DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 17:21, 21 April 2026 (UTC)
• Reference 16 is the product description on Scholastic, it shouldn’t be used for the reception.
  • I have removed it DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 17:21, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

No copyright violations or close paraphrasing that I see, and the cover art is correctly used. Edward056686 (talk) 00:36, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

These are the first things that I noticed, once those are addressed I'll take another look at the entire article. Edward056686 (talk) 16:01, 12 April 2026 (UTC)

General comments and score

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

@Edward056686: Sorry for the lateness, I did not see this! I have responded to your points. Thank you for your review :) DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 17:21, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

@DaniloDaysOfOurLives: Thank you! I only have one follow-up question. Edward056686 (talk) 18:12, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

@Edward056686: Done! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 22:59, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

That's everything then, good job! Edward056686 (talk) 07:22, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.