Talk:Star Wars

Latest comment: 15 days ago by ~2026-32241-41 in topic Clone Wars
Former good articleStar Wars was one of the Media and drama good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 20, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
May 29, 2005Featured article candidateNot promoted
December 29, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
January 13, 2006Good article nomineeListed
July 15, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
December 18, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
February 21, 2007Featured topic candidateNot promoted
May 31, 2007Good article reassessmentDelisted
April 6, 2008Good article nomineeListed
April 17, 2008Featured topic candidatePromoted
July 12, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
October 18, 2017Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article


Latin error

edit

Please correct

in media res

as

in medias res.

Thank you. 2A00:23C6:54B4:EB01:4113:D05F:188E:B510 (talk) 19:37, 12 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Done. Canterbury Tail talk 20:32, 12 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Error in "forwarding" for Attack of the Clones

edit

Under https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Wars#Films the "forwarding" when hovering over the Film Attack of the Clones seems to have an error; instead of showcasing the beginning of the Wiki article, it only shows what seems like random emojis and as far as i can tell it does it on every "forwarding" to that specific Movie.

Im not well versed with Editing etc on wikipedia, so im sorry if this is the wrong place for it, i just noticed it on this page.


Sadly, it wont let me add a Screenshot of the error. Wikiaccforthings (talk) 21:40, 6 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

There was some vandalism there that was very quickly reverted here that you're seeing. I don't know how the hover tool pulls data, but I would imagine it will refresh itself soon enough with the correct information. Darkage7[Talk] 21:57, 6 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
edit

Do you think we can add a hyperlink when is says "Fictional universe" in the lead and "Star Wars universe" in the premise, we could link it to the Universe of Star Wars page. I tried doing this earlier but my changes were reversed.

Bronson Fotiadis1 (talk) 11:51, 23 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

 Not done: According to the page's protection level you should be able to edit the page yourself. If you seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. Day Creature (talk) 16:18, 23 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 21 July 2025

edit

change "('Darths') to ('Sith Lords')" Linds266 (talk) 17:09, 21 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

 Done🪫Volatile 📲T | ⌨️C 20:06, 21 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality over quantity approach

edit

The Direct reported of "quality over quantity" approach by Lucasfilm with reduced Disney+ series, and return to films... Should it be noteworthy for inclusion.? Vestrian24Bio 16:33, 26 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

That article uses "officially" a lot when there's been nothing officially announced that says there's been a change of course. It's a pretty terrible article. Not worth mentioning here. Nemov (talk) 17:07, 26 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Pinball

edit

don't think I dare edit such an article as big and fan filled as this, but I wanted opinions,

Now with stern announcing a new SW pin, it made me realise we have 8 pinballs spanning 40 years+. would a mention of these be of any value?

unless I stand corrected there is:

1980 - The Empire Strikes Back - Hankin 1987 - Star Wars - Sonic 1992 - Star Wars - Data East 1997 - The Star Wars Trilogy - Sega 1999 - Star Wars Episode I -Williams 2017 - Star Wars - Stern 2021 - Star Wars - The Mandalorian - Stern 2025 - Star Wars: Fall of the Empire - Stern WikiPidge (talk) 23:54, 28 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Potential Projects

edit

I do not think that they should have added the part of the potentially new projects. I feel this way because nothing has been set in stone. Also, it gives the readers of this articles false hope. 128.6.147.101 (talk) 18:50, 30 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Premise section

edit

I'm doing some copyediting of this page, and I noticed that the Premise section needs better citations. I added a tag. Right now it uses a lot of primary sources (Star Wars official website), which are not appropriate. It needs reliable, secondary sources to support the text. OrdinaryOtter (talk) 13:29, 13 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Other announced projects

edit

Maybe need to clean up the Other announced projects subsection. This talk about abandoned or not updated projects.OscarFercho (talk) 05:26, 7 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Might be worth adopting a stance that unless there are sources supporting that production has started then leave "announced projects" out of the article. Nemov (talk) 12:11, 7 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
The whole Films section should probably be summarised, like the TV section is, since there is a whole dedicated article listing all the film details already. - adamstom97 (talk) 12:15, 7 May 2026 (UTC)Reply
I agree.OscarFercho (talk) 04:31, 8 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

Clone Wars

edit

Both Clone Warses are in the written description, but only one is on the list. Why? ~2026-32241-41 (talk) 14:50, 30 May 2026 (UTC)Reply