Talk:Space sexology

Merge with "Sex in space"

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To not merge given that the scope is different. Klbrain (talk) 17:20, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

---

Seems like these articles should be merged. –Yutsi - Talk/Edits 22:47, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

• Oppose They clearly cover different topics. While there is an overlap, I can see "sex in space" as also being related to popular culture rather than just real-life science. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 12:57, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

  Hey I see you closed the discussion, I used the wrong template, should I start again with the proper template that asks to merge the pages? or just leave it? Anthony2106 (talk) 12:21, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

  @Zxcvbnm what template do you use for asking for pages to be merged? Because I should of used that one. Anthony2106 (talk) 02:19, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

  @Anthony2106 You can use WP:TWINKLE for that. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 10:40, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

  @Zxcvbnm but cant you just put the template on the page manually? Anthony2106 (talk) 10:41, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

  Yeah you can, they are Template:Merge to and Template:Merge from. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 10:41, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

• Oppose Space sexology is a scientific discipline, while sex in space is its subject of study, like electricity, for example, is the subject of study of physics. Some overlap is natural. Brandmeister^talk 19:06, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 15 February 2025

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Impossible to move to the location of a previously existing article. (closed by non-admin page mover) ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 12:56, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

---

Space sexology → Sex in space – Yutsi forgot to put this template here. Anthony2106 (talk) 06:09, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

• Support sex in space. Hyperbolick (talk) 08:09, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

  @Hyperbolick but they may have wanted it the other way around witch might make more sense, because I was just adding the template for someone else, I don't know what way they wanted to merge it. Anthony2106 (talk) 08:18, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

  Wait no it says merge with sex in space. Anthony2106 (talk) 08:19, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Template:POV

Parts of the article are written like a persuasive essay. The article also has pervasive issues with WP:UNDUE, with relatively fringe perspectives being given equal or sometimes greater weight than mainstream consensus. MrTaxes (talk) 07:06, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Seminar in Human Sexuality

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 August 2025 and 3 December 2025. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): GG0328 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by GG0328 (talk) 16:27, 9 October 2025 (UTC)