Talk:Siniora Plan
 | You are an administrator, so you may disregard the message below You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If admin}}
You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of your common.css page: .ECR-edit-request-warning {
display: none;
}
Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit request This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is subject to the extended-confirmed restriction. You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.) |
| Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to the Arab–Israeli conflict.The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Untitled
editYeah, I forgot to post my reasoning. I think that in the context of condensing the Ceasefire attempts during the 2006 Israel-Lebanon conflict page, many of the details surrounding the Siniora plan could be included, and the parts relevant to the formulation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1701 could be included there. Essentially the plan's importance stems from its role in that drafting, as it isn't a functional plan in and of itself. Let me know what you think, TewfikTalk 07:00, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Needs updating
editWhat does "this week" refer to? I bet it's not the week of Sept. 13th. AnonMoos 20:45, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
I've reverted it back to the 20 August stage
editI just revisited this page after several months and found that an anon editor had doubled the length of this article on 25 August, inserting additional philosophical stuff in present tense, although the Siniora Plan became past history with the adoption of United Nations Security Council Resolution 1701 on 11 August and the article therefore had been edited into past tense on 13 August. He had also added several "aftermath" paragraphs which had nothing to do with the Siniora Plan, but were references to general statements by Fouad Siniora and other Lebanese officials about the conflict. As nothing of this had anything to do with the Siniora Plan, I've just reverted the article to the version from 20 August, when an anon user made a minor, valid correction. The revert also addresses the comment by AnonMoos above. Regards, Thomas Blomberg 23:54, 23 October 2006 (UTC)