Talk:Shrink wrap

Latest comment: 7 months ago by 2001:A61:C0D:3601:D7B:FF9F:8CF8:452F in topic Is this really shrink wrap?

bloody decapitated pig photo

edit

is it really necessary to have such a graphic and disturbing image at the top of an article about shrink wrap? at the very least, it's distracting from the topic. 157.131.109.46 (talk) 13:59, 5 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Came here to say exactly this. Not necessary at all. 195.175.15.98 (talk) 07:11, 12 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

We need to remove the redirection and create a disambiguation page

edit

We need to remove the redirection and create a disambiguation page. ShrinkWrap was a Mac OS disk image utility by Chad Magendanz. According to this TidBITS article he also worked on Microsoft's early range of multimedia titles such as Encarta, Cinemania and Music Central. Connectionfailure 23:49, 9 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

 Done some time ago. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:24, 30 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Mechanics

edit

merge

edit

It has been suggested that shrink film be merged into shrink wrap. Yes, the "shrink film" article is not even worth bothering about. I will accomplish in a couple of days. Rlsheehan (talk) 21:19, 13 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

 Done Rlsheehan (talk) 14:24, 15 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

CAMOFLAGE SHRINK WRAP

edit

IS THERE ANYTHING OUT THERE IN THE LINE OF CAMOFLAUGE SHRINK WRAP????


PLEASE LET US KNOW <redacted> AIAJA MACHINING CORP —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.69.207.76 (talk) 16:28, 3 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Three-pack of light bulbs.jpg Nominated for Deletion

edit
An image used in this article, File:Three-pack of light bulbs.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests July 2011
What should I do?
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:22, 25 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

I have no involvment with the shrink wrap industry, and I found the reverted external links helpful. For example, one link lead me to more detailed information about the manufacturing process.

I do have a problem with having both links in wikipedia, because they link to the same company, and I am wondering why we link to one company and not others. Otherwise, I think one link would be useful.

Wikfr (talk) 20:00, 29 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Spam and WP:LINKSTOAVOID say not to use commercial links. Wikipedia is not a shopping guide. The good information in commercial sites can be included in the article but it should be referenced by journal articles, books, etc. Rlsheehan (talk) 18:40, 30 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

"Shrink fim" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Shrink fim. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards, SONIC678 19:39, 27 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Is this really shrink wrap?

edit

Is the image of vegetables wrapped in plastic film from the supermarket really “shrink wrap”?

It looks like “normal” plastic film, which has a certain plasticity without being shrink wrap.

And since shrink wrap needs heat to shrink, heating fresh vegetables sounds very stupid and counterproductive. 2001:A61:C0D:3601:D7B:FF9F:8CF8:452F (talk) 06:57, 29 October 2025 (UTC)Reply