Talk:Schism in Christianity

Latest comment: 10 months ago by 23.241.193.119 in topic Super-Biased Topic

photian schism

edit

any idea why this schism with its own page is not on here? 76.84.186.230 (talk) 05:45, 10 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

I have no idea what even are the inclusion criteria for all those movements... Veverve (talk) 06:36, 10 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Society of St Pius X

edit

The SSPX should not be mentionned here. The often called schismatic act of 1988 could not constitute a schism as the disobedience it carried was collateral and not wished for. There is no schism without intention to create a separate church.

Furthermore, we know that significant reconciliation processes have incurred since 1988, most notably in 2006, 2015, 2016, which have shown that the SSPX fully recognize the Pope, and Francis's pastoral gesture towards the Society have shown it is part of Church, despite its blurred legal recognition. 2A04:CEC0:1226:4ABF:E8DF:1E7:76EB:4C55 (talk) 18:24, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Super-Biased Topic

edit

This blends heresies, real schisms, Papal confusion with the Catholic Church. It is an incredibly bad picture where anything and everything is thrown as a schism. There is no sense that Jesus left one church.

The topics should really be split: - Catholic Church and schisms - Protestant Schisms

It even shows very small schisms with small churches within Protestant denominations.

The Catholic has remained the primary entity for 2000 years and there have been two schisms within the Church: - Eastern Orthodox - Protestants

That's it...

So please someone... fix this... 99% of schisms happened within the Protestant realm. 23.241.193.119 (talk) 09:03, 8 August 2025 (UTC)Reply