Wikipedia

Talk:Sabiha Gökçen

Latest comment: 6 months ago by TheJoyfulTentmaker in topic Merging Armenian ancestry claims

fighter pilot at age 23?

edit
Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The figure 23 doesn't math with the article body. The source given mentions no age but that she became a fighter pilot sometime in 1936 (the year she turned 24). Our article body says that she only earned her wings in 1937. An article on runwaygirlnetwork.com explicitly says that she became a fighter pilot at age 23.


How do we make the article and lead consistent? Joe vom Titan (talk) 11:16, 16 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Merging Armenian ancestry claims

edit
Latest comment: 6 months ago8 comments4 people in discussion

Right now the Armenian ancestry topic is partly repeated in #Early life and #Controversies. Everything about this controversy and reactions to it should be merged in one section. Since this relates to both her Early Life and her Legacy and appears to be a minority viewpoint, I propose to collect all the info in a section called #Armenian ancestry claims or similar (suggestions are welcome). A Controversies section is strange when we only cover one controversy. Perhaps the early life section can mention the controversy in one sentence and link to the new section. Joe vom Titan (talk) 11:38, 16 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Rfc participants @Lukewarmbeer @Uness232 @TheJoyfulTentmaker @SMcCandlish @Otr500 what are your thoughts? Joe vom Titan (talk) 11:42, 16 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
I would agree that would tighten it up and a section titled "Armenian ancestry claims" or Ancestry claims (or controversy) would be very appropriate. Well done for your suggestion. Lukewarmbeer (talk) 13:50, 16 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the ping @Joe vom Titan, I support this proposal: the early life section can mention the controversy in one sentence and link to the new section. TheJoyfulTentmaker (talk) 18:26, 16 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
Support with considerations: I was pinged from a previous RFC. It was likely more of a local editing issue before going to RFC. There is no arbitration. One editor stated it is under "restricted topic, WP:XC required" (March 9, 2025), but that seems dubious. I think a bold edit with talk page reasoning might have sufficed.
The title of the WP:CRITS subsection states: "Avoid sections and articles focusing on criticisms or controversies". Although just an essay, it has enjoyed 176 editors with 146 watchers, and 867 pageviews in 30 days. An article section can be hit with a "criticism section" tag. It seems to me I read where criticisms or controversies sections were deprecated (maybe talked about), but I could be wrong.
The opening sentence states, "was a Turkish aviator." The supposed controversy apparently did not go anywhere, so I think the section doesn't need to be there. In agreement, it is an already partially covered (Early life) "minority viewpoint" and could be covered with some additional content moved there, and possibly a link to Hrant Dink. An "Armenian ancestry topic", if the subject is not Armenian, would seem to be giving the claim more prominence, provided there is no new evidence that the claim may have substance.
Interestingly, the article states (with three sources), "It is also believed that the affair was one of the reasons that led to Hrant Dink's assassination in Istanbul in January 2007". One would think that would certainly be covered in that article as more prominent than a minority viewpoint here? I somehow missed any mention of it. That article does need help. -- Otr500 (talk) 01:46, 17 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks @Otr500, mostly agree but I disagree that the Armenian ancestry claims are just a minority viewpoint. Neither Ulku Adatepe, nor the Turkish Military can be considered reliable sources on this matter, so Wikipedia should be more neutral. Is there a reason to consider them more reliable than the subjects Hrant Dink interviewed? TheJoyfulTentmaker (talk) 19:43, 20 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
I base that it is a minority viewpoint on what appears to be the fact that it was started by one person in one interview. Ultimately it did not go anywhere. The opening sentence in the article currently uses "was a Turkish aviator". If there are not any reliable sources to verify that the subject was of Armenian ancestry then why would Wikipedia advance this with such a section or subsection? I think that might be relevant if a minority viewpoint or not. -- Otr500 (talk) 22:59, 21 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
We cover ethnic background not in the lead but in the other biographical sections. The lead "was a Turkish aviator" only means that she was a citizen of Turkey, nothing more. She could be ethnically Bosnian or Armenian: both are notable as claims, and Wikipedia needs to mention both with a neutral tone, clearly attributing them to the claim owners. Armenian claims are not just due to one person by the way, more than one person support those. TheJoyfulTentmaker (talk) 19:26, 22 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Edit request

edit

I suggest doing the following to consolidate the ancestry controversy in one place:

  • #Early life: Remove the two paragraphs dealing with the Armenian ancestry claims (second and third paragraph).
  • Instead, add the sentence:

    According to a February 2004 article in the newspaper Agos, Gökçen was actually of Armenian ancestry; see Ancestry controversy.

  • Rename #Controversies to #Ancestry controversy.
  • Replace the first two sentences of that section with the text removed from #Early life and add a line break afterwards.
  • Retain all sources from the original content in the merged section.

That is, the section #Ancestry controversy should read:

In February 2004 an article in the newspaper Agos, headlined "The Secret of Sabiha Hatun", contained an interview with Hripsime Sebilciyan, a former resident of Gaziantep, who claimed to be Gökçen's niece and that Gökçen herself was of Armenian ancestry.[1] Sebilciyan claimed that Gökçen's birth name was Hatun Sebilciyan and that she was adopted by Atatürk from an orphanage in Cibin in Urfa Province.[1] Sebilcyan said that Gökçen had four brothers: Sarkis, Boğos, Haçik and Hovhannes, and a sister, Diruhi (Hripsime's mother).[1] According to Turkish-Armenian linguist Pars Tuğlacı, who knew Gökçen personally and deemed Sebilciyan's story to be false, Gökçen was born to an Armenian family from Bursa and was left in an orphanage there when her family was deported during the Armenian genocide.[2] Tuğlacı also claimed that Gökçen later found out about her Armenian roots when members of her family contacted her from Beirut and that she visited her Armenian relatives there.[2]

However, these claims are disputed by Turkish sources and interviews with Gökçen, as well as by her adopted sister Ülkü Adatepe, who reiterated that Gökçen and both of Sabiha's parents were of Bosniak ancestry.[3][4][5][6]

The notion that Gökçen could have been Armenian caused controversy in the country[7][8]; the Turkish General Staff released a statement saying that the debate "mocked national values" and was "not conducive to social peace".[9] Hrant Dink, the journalist who wrote the article, came under criticism, most notably from newspaper columnists and Turkish nationalist groups.[10][11] A leaked US consul dispatch penned by an official from the consulate in Istanbul observed that the entire affair "exposed an ugly streak of racism in Turkish society."[10] It is also believed that the affair was one of the reasons that led to Hrant Dink's assassination in Istanbul in January 2007.[12][13][14]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Joe vom Titan (talk • contribs)

 Done Thanks so much, this seems to be the most sensible solution.
  1. 1 2 3 Dink, Hrant (6 February 2004). "Sabiha Hatun'un Sırrı". Agos. Archived from the original on 4 May 2022.
  2. 1 2 "Gökçen Ermeni'ydi". Hürriyet (in Turkish). 22 February 2004. Archived from the original on 2 August 2016.
  3. ↑ Cite error: The named reference armedia was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  4. ↑ Fatma, Ulgen (1 January 2010). ""Sabiha Gök̨cen's 80-year-old secret" : Kemalist nation formation and the Ottoman Armenians" (.pdf). eScholarship. Retrieved 18 May 2017.
  5. ↑ Koser, Mutlu (23 February 2004). "İşte soyağacı". Hürriyet. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 13 July 2008.
  6. ↑ Tekin, Hüseyin (28 February 2004). "Sabiha Gökçen tartışmasında kim ne yazdı". Hürriyet (in Turkish). Archived from the original on 3 March 2016. Retrieved 13 July 2008.
  7. ↑ Morgan, Tabitha (29 February 2004). "Turkish heroine's roots spark row". BBC News.
  8. ↑ Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor (28 February 2005). "2004 Country Report on Human Rights Practices in Turkey". Country Reports on Human Rights Practices. US State Department. Retrieved 25 July 2008. In February, the Hurriyet newspaper's publication of a report that Sabiha Gokcen--an adopted daughter of Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, who was the country's first female pilot--was of Armenian descent drew a number of racist public statements. The Turkish General Staff issued a statement criticizing the reports on Gokcen's alleged Armenian ancestry as 'a claim that abuses national values and feelings' while the Turkish Air Association called the report 'an insult' to Gokcen and to Ataturk.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  9. ↑ Morgan, Tabitha (29 February 2004). "Turkish heroine's roots spark row". BBC. Retrieved 11 January 2018.
  10. 1 2 "Cable reference id: #04ISTANBUL374". 10 March 2004. Archived from the original on 9 December 2013. Retrieved 17 November 2014.
  11. ↑ Cite error: The named reference :1 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  12. ↑ Insel, Ahmet (28 February 2009). ""Bu Hareket Beşeriyet Namına Bir Cinayetti": Ermenilerden Özür Dileme Girişiminin Değerlendirilmesi". Birikim (in Turkish). Archived from the original on 6 October 2018. Retrieved 6 October 2014.
  13. ↑ Kemal Cengiz, Orhan (15 January 2010). "The 'smoke' which killed Hrant Dink". Zaman. Archived from the original on 7 October 2014.
  14. ↑ Göktaş, Kemal (2009). Hrant Dink cinayeti: medya, yargı, devlet (1. baskı. ed.). İstanbul: Güncel Yayıncılık. ISBN 978-9944840491.
Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Sabiha_Gökçen&oldid=1333745586"