 | SMS Mücke has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: June 24, 2025. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
Photo
editGA review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Mücke/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 15:48, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 15:42, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
Will review soon. Jaguar (talk) 15:42, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
- Body
- "...which included plans to build at least eight vessels, to as many as eighteen armored warships" - try condensing to ranging from plans to build eight to as many as eighteen armored warships.
- Works for me
- "as designed and 1,163 t (1,145 long tons) at full load" - I assume it increases at full load? Maybe as designed, increasing to 1,163 t (1,145 long tons) at full load
- Done
- " and in that time, she was refitted with an additional 8.7 cm (3.4 in)" - during which she was refitted
- Done
- " Mücke again served as the flagship for the unit, which also included Viper, Salamander, and their sister Camaeleon." - can be shortened to with Mücke once again serving as flagship alongside Viper, Salamander, and their sister Camaeleon.
- Good idea. Thanks for another review! Parsecboy (talk) 12:12, 26 June 2025 (UTC)
Another well-written article, nothing much from me this time other than those nitpicks. I see no reason to put it on hold, and will promote outright given it's comprehensiveness. Well done. 
Jaguar (talk) 20:53, 24 June 2025 (UTC)