Talk:Royal Alberta Museum
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
 |
This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Royal Alberta Museum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120531170442/http://www.royalalbertamuseum.ca/general/q-facts.htm to http://www.royalalbertamuseum.ca/general/q-facts.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051213195245/http://www.royalalbertamuseum.ca/general/roy_vis.htm to http://www.royalalbertamuseum.ca/general/roy_vis.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110410061848/http://www.edmontonjournal.com/travel/Downtown+Edmonton+site/4576854/story.html to http://www.edmontonjournal.com/travel/Downtown+Edmonton+site/4576854/story.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:04, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The information concerning the former museum building could easily fit in a paragraph or two here at the main article. 162 etc. (talk) 17:49, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- The old building is different from the current museum and will likely undergo either adaptive reuse into another community use or be transformed into a park which has nothing to do with the current museum, and there is also much to add about the architecture and construction of the original building. Jan Gehl (talk) 19:22, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- The section on the architecture and design of the original building, as the article reads today, is four sentences long. This can fit at the main article.
- The building's post-2015 history, including speculation on future uses, fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:CRYSTAL. 162 etc. (talk) 21:32, 25 October 2025 (UTC)
- I see books in the library that could help and I am happy to write more about the architecture but I don't want to do it if it's only going to be deleted. How do these things get decided? I'm new to this Jan Gehl (talk) 00:28, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
- Oppose merge: These are two separate buildings, and Jan Gehl has expressed an interest in expanding it. I'd like to see what they come up with. MediaKyle (talk) 13:05, 3 November 2025 (UTC)