Former good articleRoger Ebert was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
In the news Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 4, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
January 3, 2017Good article nomineeListed
July 24, 2025Good article reassessmentDelisted
In the news A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on April 4, 2013.
Current status: Delisted good article

'Midwestern writing style'

edit

There is no such thing.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.68.94.86 (talk) 15:36, 30 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Article review

edit

It has been a while since this article was reviewed, so I took a look and noticed the following:

  • There are uncited statements, including lots of the awards/honours he received.
  • At over 12,000 words, the article is considered WP:TOOBIG. There are lots of large sections that can be trimmed or moved to other articles, like "Critical style" and "Preferences"
  • There are lots of block quotes used in the article. Considering that the article is longer then the recommended length, I think this is a good place to better summarise the article.

Should this article go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 15:53, 22 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:17, 24 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

There are uncited statements, including lots of the awards/honours he received. At over 12,000 words, the article is considered WP:TOOBIG and detailed. There are lots of large sections that can be trimmed or moved to other articles, like "Critical style" and "Preferences". There's also lots of block quotes used in the article. Considering that the article is longer then the recommended length, I think this is a good place to better summarise the article per WP:SS. Z1720 (talk) 00:46, 24 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

WRONG!

edit

"In 1999, he founded the Overlooked Film Festival in his hometown of Champaign, Illinois." The man was from Urbana -- The article even says he was born there and went to UHS. Champaign is the twin city of Urbana. It's like St. Paul and Minneapolis. Kdammers (talk) 15:27, 7 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Fixed. Sunshineisles2 (talk) 02:26, 24 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:37, 20 February 2026 (UTC)Reply