Talk:Rodney Artmore

Latest comment: 11 months ago by Gonzo fan2007 in topic GA review

GA review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Rodney Artmore/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: BeanieFan11 (talk · contribs) 22:24, 19 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Gonzo fan2007 (talk · contribs) 21:58, 20 June 2025 (UTC)Reply


I'll do this one. « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 21:58, 20 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Comments

edit
  • Broncbusters and Baylor Bears and was the "and" "and" "and" is repetitious, can you reword?
  • three further games "further" --> "additional"
  • Shouldn't his season in the infobox just be "1999"?
    • I was thinking it'd make sense to have "1998" given that he was on the team during that season (and during the regular season, too, not just the offseason).
  • There isn't anything else post his arrest?
    • I did several searches and found nothing.
  • References:
    • All are appropriate for what is being cited
    • All are consistently formatted
    • Spot checks: 3, 4, 6, 9, 10, 13

Not much here, good job! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk) @ 22:29, 20 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.