Talk:Rewati Chetri
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Otr500 in topic References and "External link"
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 17 September 2016. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
References and "External link"
editI marked a dead link, removed a redundant link, and took out the link under "External links". This was just a general link to the pageant, that has nothing specifically to do with the subject, and if the notability of the pageant is in question so then would be the subject. Otr500 (talk) 07:05, 24 September 2016 (UTC)
- The "External link", I removed because it is pageant spam and inappropriate per WP:ELNO (Take your pick: #1, #4, #13, and #19), was added back. The link is to a pageant site that is not "relevant to an encyclopedic understanding of the subject".
- Dated maintenance tags were edited out, that is actually a revert, while the issue is unresolved. A reference from the same source, that offers nothing unique, and containing the same information as another, is redundant only showing that there are more references than there really are. This site contains the sub-title 5 things you should know about Rewati Chetri", dated July 16, 2016. Another reference is titled 5 things you should know about Rewati Chetri, an exact copy.
- Reverting, or re-editing that is a subtle revert, any content that is deleted under maintenance procedures, especially with justifiable reasoning backed by policies and guidelines, an edit summary, and talk page rationale, and most certainly when done without any discussion or edit summary, can be seen as vandalism but is certainly disruptive editing. Otr500 (talk) 02:11, 26 September 2016 (UTC)