Talk:Raphidomonadea
Latest comment: 9 months ago by Snoteleks in topic Requested move 31 August 2025
| This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move 31 August 2025
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: no move. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Snoteleks (talk) 14:20, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
Raphidomonadea → Raphidophyceae – These sources support this name: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130114 and https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-017-1147-3. Jako96 (talk) 17:07, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
- @Jako96 No, there's been a confusion, Raphidomonadea and Raphidophyceae are not the same taxa. You're looking for the raphidophyte page. — Snoteleks (talk) 18:17, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
- You're right. Jako96 (talk) 19:25, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
- @Snoteleks You might want to check this requested move, though. Jako96 (talk) 20:02, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
- @Jako96 I will close this request since I believe we are both in agreement. — Snoteleks (talk) 14:19, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
- @Snoteleks You might want to check this requested move, though. Jako96 (talk) 20:02, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
- You're right. Jako96 (talk) 19:25, 31 August 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.