| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Queen Victoria Market article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
.svg){kind=small} | This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (centre, colour, realise, program, travelled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Former Cemetery
editIs there a source for the removal of the disinterred statement (that only 10% of the former cemetery was disinterred)?? Citizen D 00:22, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
- I've got the new Encyclopedia of Melbourne on my Christmas list. Hopefully I'll be able to confirm this information in a few weeks. :) Cnwb 00:48, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
- Should be the source of many new Melbourne additions here I would hope. Dropped hints for my copy but nothing confirmed from family OR friends :(. Interesting to find out though simply because I find it hard to believe that most bodies would not be relocated, even in the 19th century. Citizen D 03:30, 1 December 2005 (UTC)
Verification?
editCan someone please explain to me why a small, 200 odd word article that has reference to a print encyclopedia, and an official website for the subject has a banner asking for more references for validation? This textbox/banner should be removed until the article expands and more information is introduced (a lot more in my opinion) Citizen D 21:28, 11 November 2007 (UTC)
Reference
editI'm not sure how to use this reference or where to put it, so il just leave it here
- Brown-May, Andrew & Swain, Shurlee (2005) The Encyclopedia Of Melbourne. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-84234-4
Chumchum14 (talk) 12:25, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
- Just add it in under the References section exactly as you've done here. Citizen D (talk) 00:25, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
- But there is no inline citation, i don't know where the references actually cites in the article. Chumchum14 (talk) 02:31, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
- Reference added. Citizen D (talk) 09:13, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- Just copy another reference from another article, that's what I still do. Aaroncrick (talk) 09:21, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- Reference added. Citizen D (talk) 09:13, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- But there is no inline citation, i don't know where the references actually cites in the article. Chumchum14 (talk) 02:31, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
This article had over half a dozen references in the usual style, and two using a largely superceded style. I put the two non-standard references in the usual style. One of these references had disappeared because it wasn't being handled properly. Geo Swan (talk) 05:10, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
Neutrality
editThe lead is rather biased and isn't very 'encyclopaedic' in its tone. I would fix it but no-one else seems to have pointed it out. Deonyi (talk) 12:02, 2 November 2014 (UTC)