Talk:Queen Elizabeth-class aircraft carrier
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Queen Elizabeth-class aircraft carrier article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives (index): 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 12 months  |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
.svg)
| Queen Elizabeth-class aircraft carrier has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Up-to?
editArticle currently reads in part Up-to two ASRAAMs can be carried on the outermost external weapon stations, whilst up-to four Meteors can be carried internally, which I find jarring... why not Up to two ASRAAMs can be carried on the outermost external weapon stations, whilst up to four Meteors can be carried internally? This seems to have exactly the same meaning and is more natural. There are three more occurrences of up-to in the following section, and all seem similarly jarring to me. Am I missing something? Andrewa (talk) 00:29, 6 November 2025 (UTC)
UK's plans to extend the range of the F-35B
editI've not been able to find and reports on any UK plans to extend the range of F-35Bs off their carriers. Apparently, Lockheed-Martin has done work on creating a "buddy stores" system that will allow the F-35 to be like an F-18 and areal refuel other aircraft. The UK doesn't have V-22 so they can't have Boeing complete development of the VARS pod. Are there any public comments about any plans for the UK to add buddy stores to their fleet F-35s? CycloneSteve (talk) 17:04, 29 January 2026 (UTC)