Talk:Public Policy Forum
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Directly Ripped or Not?
editThe first three headings (Convening, Research, and Awards) are directly ripped from the body text under those same headings from their official website, not from the sources implied by citation 2001:56B:3FEB:1646:54D9:6DFF:FE18:B596 (talk) 14:23, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
> Another viewpoint: It's true that the headings correspond to the website of the think tank - but the references seems accurate: the first two are examples of "Convening" and the third is an example of "Research."
Now, one could rename these headings to, say, "Events" instead of "Convening" and "Reports" instead of "Research". It would feel less "ripped", and perhaps more neutral, but I don't really think it's a gain in clarity. To my knowledge, Wikipedia does not demand that the products of corporations are paraphrased (say call something an "Apple Corp. Laptop" instead of a "MacBook". My 2 cents ... I get the point though.
