I don't see where pseudochirality is mentioned in the 2025 ACS publication. The pseudochirality conference paper cites it in a vague way. The IUPAC Gold Book entry is a brief technical definition. Only the conference paper appears to be in-depth and on-topic. The draft has not yet clearly established general notability, and it is written using technical terminology that could be difficult for general audiences to understand. WeyerStudentOfAgrippa (talk) 17:12, 14 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
- Pseudochirality is not mentioned by name in the ACS paper. It is shown in diagrams throughout the paper. For example in figures 4a, 4b, 4c, 4d, 4e, and 4f axially pseudo chiral molecules are shown. I use the paper as proof axially pseudochiral molecules can impact drug effects, which I do talk about briefly. Research and sources for pseudochirality are incredibly hard to come by. For this reason I used these sources as they were the only ones I could find. I believe this article has established notability because of the reliability of the gold book definition as well as the in-depth explanation from the conference paper. I do agree that the paper does use technical terminology and would appreciate advice on how to fix this. Thank you Sage693 (talk) 22:41, 15 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
