Talk:Prosody (music)
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Merge?
editThis is a valid subject. However, shouldn't it be merged with the main prosody article as it's ultimately all the same? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.95.244.2 (talk) 12:26, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
Assessment
editThere doesn't ever seem to be an attempt in this article to actually define its subject. Trumpetrep (talk) 02:16, 3 December 2025 (UTC)
Proposed additions: Definition and constructional elements (COI disclosure and edit request)
edit| The user below has a request that an edit be made to Prosody (music). That user has an actual or apparent conflict of interest. The requested edits backlog is very high. Please be extremely patient. There are currently 557 requests waiting for review. Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies. |
Hello. I would like to propose two related additions to the article, one of which responds to the existing assessment note that the article does not clearly define its subject. Per WP:COI, I am disclosing that I am Shane Adams, the author of the book cited as the source. I am not editing the article directly and am requesting that an uninvolved editor review the proposed text and decide whether it is appropriate to include.
My background: I am an associate professor at Berklee NYC and a founding instructor at Berklee Online, and the cited book is published by Berklee Press. The first proposed addition offers a concise definition addressing the article's current lack of one. The second expands coverage of the broad definition of musical prosody (already attributed to Pat Pattison) by enumerating specific constructional elements and providing widely recognized song examples, without duplicating or displacing existing content.
I welcome any edits, trimming, or rewording an uninvolved editor feels would improve neutrality or fit with the rest of the article.
Proposed addition 1: Definition paragraph, to be placed at or near the start of the article
The term prosody, from the Greek prosōidía ("song sung to music"), traditionally describes the alignment of a word's natural linguistic accent with non-textual elements of a musical setting, such as rhythmic and metrical accent and melodic direction. In this narrow sense, a setting exhibits good prosody when stressed syllables of a lyric fall on stressed beats or prominent melodic notes, so that the sung text approximates natural speech. Contemporary songwriting pedagogy has expanded the term to describe the alignment of lyrics with any musical element that contributes to the song's meaning or emotional effect.[1]
Proposed addition 2: New section, to be placed after the existing paragraph citing Pat Pattison
Constructional elements
editBuilding on the expanded definition of prosody as the alignment of any musical element with lyric meaning, songwriter and Berklee associate professor Shane Adams has catalogued specific constructional elements a songwriter can deliberately align with a lyric's story and emotion. These include tempo, harmonic rhythm, chord quality, key, arrangement, lyric density, melodic note values, melodic contour, and rhythmic feel. Adams frames these collectively as "how you say the words," drawing an analogy to the way vocal tone and inflection alter the meaning of a spoken phrase such as "it's time to leave," which can be delivered as a command, a question, a sigh of regret, or a sarcastic aside depending on non-textual cues.[2]
Adams identifies several dimensions along which prosody can operate in popular song. Melodic contour can mirror a lyric image, as in "Over the Rainbow" (Harburg and Arlen), in which the opening leap and subsequent descent trace an arc that visually echoes a rainbow. Pitch selection can reinforce a single word, as in "Friends in Low Places" (Lee and Blackwell), where the word "low" falls on the lowest melodic note of the chorus. Structural placement of the title or hook within a chorus can also generate prosody: in Lorde's "Royals," the title is positioned at the front of every chorus line, putting the "royals" ahead of everything else and reinforcing the song's theme of unattainable status; in Neon Trees' "Everybody Talks," the title arrives only on the final line of the chorus, mirroring the lyric's depiction of a rumor building from a whisper to widespread talk; and in George Michael's "Careless Whisper," the hook "never gonna dance again" appears at both the beginning and end of the chorus with an empty middle, evoking the isolation described in the lyric.[3]
Thank you and best regards,
Shane Adams Artistaccelerator (talk) 18:08, 14 April 2026 (UTC)