Talk:Prison Break

Latest comment: 5 months ago by TompaDompa in topic GA Reassessment
Former good articlePrison Break was one of the Media and drama good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 10, 2006Good article nomineeListed
November 6, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
May 12, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
November 12, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
July 19, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
January 1, 2026Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

"Szökés" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

The redirect Szökés has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 13 § Szökés until a consensus is reached. Joy (talk) 17:00, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

"Szokes" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

The redirect Szokes has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 13 § Szokes until a consensus is reached. Joy (talk) 17:00, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

"Szoekes" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

The redirect Szoekes has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 13 § Szoekes until a consensus is reached. Joy (talk) 17:00, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merge for awards list

edit

List of awards and nominations received by Prison Break is fairly short; even if some currently missing but notable awards are added, it would still fit easily into this article. I propose merging the list into this article, essentially replacing the current "Awards and nominations" section. RunningTiger123 (talk) 01:34, 11 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

100% merge. Drovethrughosts (talk) 12:35, 11 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

It doesn't seem like this will be a controversial merge, so I will perform the merge shortly. RunningTiger123 (talk) 03:03, 16 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Article review

edit

It has been a while since this article has been reviewed, so I took a look and noticed the following:

  • The article has some uncited statements, including some short paragraphs. While some of this is covered in MOS:PLOT, others are not.
  • Season 4 and 5 of the "Series overview" needs to be cleaned up. I suggest merging the short paragraphs into larger ones and trimming prose for the most important information.
  • The first paragraphs of the "Cast and characters" section talks about seasons 1-3, but not of seasons 4-5. Information about those seasons should be added.
  • The "Cast and characters" section is too detailed. This causes in-universe information to be over-emphasised. I do not think every character who has been billed as a main cast member should have information about them, especially when there is an article for the list of characters.
  • "Other media" suffers a little from MOS:OVERSECTION. I suggest that this is either expanded upon or reorganised to delete some headings.

Should this article go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 15:26, 23 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Issues remain unaddressed, no ongoing effort to fix them (the last substantial edit being more than three weeks ago). TompaDompa (talk) 23:50, 1 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

The article has some uncited statements, including some short paragraphs. While some of this is covered in MOS:PLOT, others are not. Season 4 and 5 of the "Series overview" needs to be cleaned up. I suggest merging the short paragraphs into larger ones and trimming prose for the most important information. The first paragraphs of the "Cast and characters" section talks about seasons 1-3, but not of seasons 4-5. Information about those seasons should be added. The "Cast and characters" section is too detailed. This causes in-universe information to be over-emphasised. I do not think every character who has been billed as a main cast member should have information about them, especially when there is an article for the list of characters. "Other media" suffers a little from MOS:OVERSECTION. I suggest that this is either expanded upon or reorganised to delete some headings. Z1720 (talk) 16:26, 7 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

If the plot unreferenced statements are in episodes, then that's fine as the plot is the source. If the statements are in other places, then an episode citation should be added. Gonnym (talk) 09:07, 8 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Noting for the record that while there have been no further comments here indicating interest in resolving the issues outlined above, the article has been substantially edited by Drovethrughosts in the meantime. For clarity as to whether this could be closed or should remain open: Drovethrughosts, is it your intention to resolve the issues raised above during the course of this WP:GAR? TompaDompa (talk) 21:32, 23 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.