Talk:Priory of Sion

Latest comment: 5 months ago by Rjjiii in topic Citations Needed
Former good articlePriory of Sion was one of the Philosophy and religion good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 29, 2008Good article nomineeListed
May 6, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
June 18, 2008Peer reviewReviewed
September 23, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
June 16, 2024Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

GA Reassessment

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment page • GAN review not found
Result: No improvement Real4jyy (talk) 05:28, 16 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Not sure about the main banner (unclear citation style), but lots of uncited paragraphs and statements; no longer seems to meet the recent-ish standards for citation at GA level. UndercoverClassicist T·C 09:13, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
edit

Under "Myth: Plantard's Plot" is the phrase "Priory of Sion being a medieval society that was the source of the 'underground stream' of esotericism in Europe"; "underground stream" is linked to the article on Alfeios, a Greek river system. But no explanation here is given for this particular link. As "underground stream" in the figurative sense is self-explanatory, unless someone can identify in the article why that particular river system is apropos, I would recommend simply removing the link. Al Begamut (talk) 19:08, 15 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

The link has been removed. --Loremaster (talk) 17:09, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

Avis de décès de Monsieur Philippe TOSCAN DU PLANTIER paru le 09/03/2000 - département Paris - Libra Memoria https://www.libramemoria.com/defunts/toscan-du-plantier-philippe/5f4a528c29c246b983f46fa2ad4bc34a

THANKS Octavius88 (talk) 19:33, 17 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

If we are going to mention Gino Sandri

edit

Then we may as well mention Marco Rigamonti, the current head of the Priory of Sion. For the record, the current PoS is an attempt at bridging the PoS of the Dossiers Secrets and the PoS of 1989-1990. Which we all know is like saying Black is White and White is Black. But anything goes in the world of fantasy. Octavius88 (talk) 20:22, 27 December 2024 (UTC)Reply

Citations Needed

edit

I am positive that Plantard was a hoaxer, but without citations the statements that he is look like original research. Could someone with better knowledge of that topic get some solid backing in the article? Whateley23 (talk) 01:34, 9 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

I resolved the first one with a quote from the cited source. The next one I looked at is likely covered by footnote 6 but that's an entire book with no cited page numbers. The material cited to the book could be handled better with citations to locations in the book, done with shortened footnotes, {{rp}} superscript page numbers, or duplicate citations. There's a copy on archive.org but it will be a bit of a project to check all the material and find pages. Rjjiii (talk) 04:08, 9 January 2026 (UTC)Reply