Talk:Pocket set theory
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Richard L. Peterson in topic Suppose pocket set theorywere studied seriously by a substantial number
 | This page was proposed for deletion by Tea2min (talk · contribs) on 9 February 2021. It was contested by Tea2min (talk · contribs) on 10 February 2021 with the comment: Self-deprod: While there apparently are no independent sources, there are external pages referencing this article that suggest that the topic is notable to experts. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Are there any secondary sources?
editApparently, pocket set theory was invented/developed by M. Randall Holmes (motivated by a suggestion of Rudy Rucker), and his entry on "Alternative Set Theories" in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy and his "not very serious notes" apparently are the only sources for this article. Are there any secondary sources at all? – Tea2min (talk) 11:26, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
Suppose pocket set theorywere studied seriously by a substantial number
editnumber of researchers. Wouldn't they naturally start studying proper classes in this theory, that were formerly very big sets in the ordinary set theory, that were swept under the rug by pocket set theory? Rich (talk) 02:55, 2 May 2025 (UTC)