| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| It is requested that an image or photograph of Plug & Pray be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other websites. |
Robotics attention needed
edit- Expand if possible
- Check citations
- Reassess and add importance
Style
editUm, this is written like it was someone plugging a documentary
"Eloquent and tactful, he questions the prevailing discourses on new technologies, and their ethical relationships to human life. "
Yeah, what does "Eloquent and tactful" add to that sentence, or article, in terms of content? That isn't even a cited quote from a reviewer or anything. Also, all 5 citations are just about when and where it screened and the awards it won. I understand a synopsis doesn't need a citation every 6 words, but if you're going make an article to jerk off the people involved with this film, at least try to get half of statements backed up facts and only use the flowery bullshit for the more inherently subjective sections of an article like reception. -- 96.30.141.139 (talk) 19:34, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
- I saw and changed some of that text before reading your comment. I agree completely, and welcome additional edits. --tgeller (talk) 15:11, 28 August 2015 (UTC)



