Talk:Pikmin Finder

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Pikmin Finder/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Captain Galaxy (talk · contribs) 14:35, 16 October 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: Arconning (talk · contribs) 10:16, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

Shall review. Arconning (talk) 10:16, 18 October 2025 (UTC)

@Captain Galaxy Here are some of the comments I can see on a first look! Arconning (talk) 13:37, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

@Captain Galaxy Some more comments:

• On December 31, 2024, Nintendo announced on the game's webpage that its services had been discontinued", considering this game was made for a promotion, would that be the reason why it shut down?

I think that would count as WP:NOR as Nintendo themselves never mentioned what the reason for discontinuation was. CaptainGalaxy 11:24, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

• Wikilink first mention of "Pikmin" without the indentation to Pikmin#Pikmin creatures

 Done

Arconning (talk) 10:07, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

@Arconning: I have gone ahead and answered the suggestions above. CaptainGalaxy 11:24, 26 October 2025 (UTC)

Prose and MoS

Lead and infobox

• " It is the second mobile game in the Pikmin franchise, following Pikmin Bloom, and is the seventh installment in the series overall.", I don't see this anywhere in the body?

• I have gone ahead and removed the seventh installment part of the statement. CaptainGalaxy 13:49, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

Gameplay

• "Pikmin Finder is an augmented reality mobile game, utilising AR gameplay", should specify what AR means. Basically "augmented reality (AR)" then use "AR" for every mention after.

•  Done

Development and release

• "The game was originally release to coincide", "released"

•  Done

• "Nintendo Live in Seattle, Washington ", just add a comma after this. Sorry if it's nitpicky

•  Done

• " to allow for easier play in whilst", wondering why "in" is here?

•  Done Removed.

Reception

• "deemed nothing more", "deemed it nothing more"

•  Done

• "but acknowledge the game's", "but acknowledged the game's"

•  Done

Media

• Images are properly licensed and are relevant to the article. All good here.

Refs

• Earwig's alright.
• Ref checks: 2, 3, 7, 9. All good.

Misc

• No ongoing edit war, broad enough information, neutral.

• @Arconning: I have gone ahead and implemented the requested changes. If you have anymore to add, please let me know. Thank you for taking on this review. CaptainGalaxy 13:49, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.