Talk:Peter Safran

[Untitled]

This article misses Flypaper (2011 film) which was coproduced by Safran. He might also have something to do with a certain Natalia Safran who had a little, almost silent part. --Oop (talk) 23:41, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Peter Safran. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117467051.html?categoryid=18&cs=1
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080516163620/http://www.safrandigital.com/ to http://www.safrandigital.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:52, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

• GettyImages-173522781.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:52, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

filmography issue.

@Chrisahn might i be so bold as to ask why you keep reverting my edits. i have given valid explanations and on the plus side as well all the information is still intact just all in one space. if i could have a valid explanation and i mean a valid one which i haven't received thus far as to why my edit is considered unacceptable then I'll back off my changes despite my disagreements if it means peace and quiet without major dispute. despite my off kilter approach i can be reasonable because i don't want an edit war that ends in nothing but blocking and headaches. Laddyfisher (talk) 20:31, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

could @Chrisahn respond Laddyfisher (talk) 20:46, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

There is no rush. You'll often have to wait a few days for a response. Get used to it. — Chrisahn (talk) 20:47, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

cool down don't bite my head off you'd think i was suggesting we commit crime on here. Laddyfisher (talk) 20:52, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

I'll simply copy what @Trailblazer101 wrote in the edit summary of the first revert of your major changes: Reverted 2 edits by Laddyfisher (talk): Per MOS:VAR, revert undiscussed substantial changes to the article's structure and formatting. Please discuss any concerns at the talk page, but do not revert once changes have been contested. When another editor reverts your changes, don't just reinstate them. Instead, start a discussion. It can be annoying that you can't just do what you want, but that's how it works. If you want to collaborate here on Wikipedia, you'll have to get used to the rules. — Chrisahn (talk) 20:47, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

I don't have a strong opinion, merging the tables would be fine with me. But we need to make sure that no information is lost. In your edit, you removed the formatting of the rows about upcoming films. Maybe there were other issues as well, I don't know. Let's wait until @Trailblazer101 responds. Might take a few days, or just a few minutes. Either way, we'll wait. There's no hurry. — Chrisahn (talk) 20:51, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

that is all i wanted to know thank you. took longer than i hoped but you gave a not terrible response which is reasonable to me i do hope our future conversions our more fruitful in the future. Laddyfisher (talk) 20:53, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

"took longer than I hoped" Well, by Wikipedia standards, a response within 20 minutes is very quick. You'll have to get used to how things are done here. :-) — Chrisahn (talk) 20:57, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

okay okay cool down i was simply making a point of my feelings on the matter, now that you stated that little nugget of information, i am more understanding of such processes. now that we've gotten through our little concern I'll agree to point my edits away from this page until such a time as a decision can be made. with regards. Laddyfisher (talk) 21:00, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Laddyfisher, I have advised you to not take everything to the extreme. You are expected to assume good faith of your fellow editors, something you routinely fail to do. Not everything is a WP:BATTLEGROUND here, and I have previously warned you plenty of times about your behavior and edit warring, which is not allowed. I would strongly urge you to take a step back when your edits are reverted and try to hear others out when there is a disagreement, rather than jumping the gun.

As for the contents of the article, in my opinion, it makes sense to distinguish films Safran has produced for Warner Bros. (where his company has an overall co-production deal and through which he is presently employed to c-run DC Studios) from his other producing ventures. The directors column in the tables may not be as necessary, but it is helpful to include for some of the earlier indie horror films that do not have their own Wikipedia articles. I also arranged for these tables to be aligned via columns to make some good use of the excessive whitespace left behind should they have remained a consecutive table, to avoid it from becoming too excessive in the name of WP:Accessibility. In your edits, you also removed the italicization of the film titles and other table formatting. — Trailblazer¹⁰¹🔥 ^{(discuss · contribs)} 21:46, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

not that i agree with that opinion but fine i'll my previous changes to the side. Laddyfisher (talk) 21:57, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

oh and you'd be surprised how reasonable i can be when the chance is given Laddyfisher (talk) 21:58, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

I do not think you have exhibited that based on all of my interactions with you, but I digress. No one has provoked you and no one on here is your enemy. We are all fellow volunteer contributors to this ever growing encyclopedia project and we have to collaborate and civily communicate with one another. — Trailblazer¹⁰¹🔥 ^{(discuss · contribs)} 22:05, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

well that's a shame i think you have sorely misjudged me but i hold no ill will towards you. if you think a certain way about me as an editor then oh well like i always say it's all subjective when it comes to opinions right? can't win over everyone. maybe one day we'll both be proven wrong about each other but as you say i digress Laddyfisher (talk) 22:09, 29 March 2026 (UTC)