Talk:Peephole

Untitled

needs disambig. link, because there are Peephole optimization article — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.40.246.117 (talk) 07:05, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Nero Wolfe

Is this relevant and/or notable enough to take up more than half the article? 144.32.60.66 (talk) 19:19, 4 October 2013 (UTC)

Some information presented is blatantly untrue.

Some of the information presented is blatantly untrue. The following statement is untrue... "The lenses are made and arranged in such a way that viewing is only possible in one direction." This is not how a peephole optical device works. It's like looking through a pair of binoculars, backwards... Although things look further away, you can see a much wider field of view. And just like a pair of binoculars, you can look through the other end of an optical device, so, I can see directly into your home, apt., or hotel room. Don't believe me? Try it yourself next time you see a door with a peephole. Don't get caught doing it. Could end badly. 2601:602:8B01:1230:B1E0:403B:77A9:D4CD (talk) 23:42, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

"Judas hatch" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Judas hatch has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 November 11 § Judas hatch until a consensus is reached. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:00, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

"Judas (peephole)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Judas (peephole) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 15 § Judas (peephole) until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 05:29, 15 December 2025 (UTC)