| Part Time Punks has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: March 23, 2026. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
for later
editespecially after Bill Grundy's infamous 1976 live TV interview with the Sex Pistols, during which the band swore and after which the TV host was fired from the ITV network.[1] Ceoil (talk) 22:16, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
GA review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Part Time Punks/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Ceoil (talk · contribs) 20:51, 18 January 2026 (UTC)
Reviewer: Watagwaan (talk · contribs) 17:59, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
The incomparable Ceoil! Let's do this.
General
edit- Just an idea, I'd merge the "References" and "Sources" together into one references section, and then separate them with the subheads "Citations" and "Bibliography".
- yeah and tks; done. Ceoil (talk) 23:17, 27 February 2026 (UTC)
- There's more information regarding the song's release in the lead then there is in the actual "Release and aftermath" section. I know that release information is covered in "Recording and distribution" but then why not just move the distribution information there into "Release and aftermath"? It's a bit odd organization-wise.
- To expand on that, the "Reception and influence" section itself seems smaller compared to the rest. What if you combined the distribution details with that section and titled it "Release and reception"?
- Throughout the article the song title is inconsistently formatted. In some places, it is italicized like Part Time Punks and in others, it is formatted like the regular "Part Time Punks". Was this intentional?
- done. Ceoil (talk) 23:17, 27 February 2026 (UTC)
- Piggybacking on that, "Where's Bill Grundy Now?" in the lead should be formatted as Where's Bill Grundy Now?.
- done. Ceoil (talk) 23:17, 27 February 2026 (UTC)
- Could combine the second and third paragraphs in "Background" since they're only two sentences each.
- done. Ceoil (talk) 23:17, 27 February 2026 (UTC)
- Could move The track was written by the band's leader and vocalist Dan Treacy. into "Lyrics and style".
- Are the singles in the infobox meant to be in bold?
- eeek, fixed. Ceoil (talk) 23:17, 27 February 2026 (UTC)
- Could make the caption of the audio file more descriptive, other than just the word "Sample".
Lead
edit- I would suggest condensing the sentences ever-so-slightly just to make it easier to read. It felt a bit dense the first time around and admittedly I think some of it doesn't need to be in the lead. If you choose to adapt this change, here's my sample lead, if you want you can use this or rewrite based off this:
- "Part Time Punks" is a song by the English post-punk group Television Personalities. It initially appeared on their 1978 EP Where's Bill Grundy Now?, and was released by Rough Trade Records as a single in 1980. Written by lead singer Dan Treacy and composed by the band, "Part Time Punks" satirise the late-comer, fashion-oriented, so-called "plastic" punks who appeared after the English punk rock movement became mainstream.
- "Part Time Punks" sold about 27,000 copies in its first year and brought Television Personalities to prominence within the then-emerging independent music scene. Though it was one of the band's best-selling releases, Treacy came to regard the track as a millstone and somewhat of a novelty song.
- This is a very good suggestion. Ceoil (talk) 19:17, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
Final comments
editThe entire article overall reads REALLY well and you never cease to amaze me with the amount of effort you put into your articles. Some of these things are just formatting issues, but other than that, I'd be glad to pass this article after you give this a gander! Cheers!
- As an update have found a new source that gives a lot more detail and context. Appreciate that this has gone on a bit, but will try and close out today. Ceoil (talk) 20:32, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
Hi, think have sorted the remaining structural issues and am asking for a review to close out the GA review. Ceoil (talk) 01:09, 23 March 2026 (UTC)
- Your wish is granted! Great work as always @Ceoil, and I'm happy to look at your articles anytime. Watagwaan (talk) 11:41, 23 March 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you!!!! Ceoil (talk) 15:28, 23 March 2026 (UTC)
- ↑ Young 2006, p. 260.