Talk:Pacific Northwest Corridor
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Another Believer in topic Re: high speed rail in the PNW
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pacific Northwest Corridor article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 5 years |
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cascadia high-speed rail (proposition) was merged into this article. The discussion was closed on 15 March 2009 with a consensus to merge. The original page is now a redirect to this article. Its history now serves to provide attribution for the content in this article, and it must not be deleted as long as this article exists. |
here is one mistake
editin order for it to be an actual high speed rail its maximum speed must be at the very least 125 mph, yet the maximum speed for this thing will only be 110 mph so this is actually a higher-speed railroad. 50.115.194.122
- I see what you mean, however, 110 MPH is considered a high speed service in North America. Also, using the term "higher-speed railroad" makes it seem as if the train travels faster than normal high speed trains. As a result, I think that it should be left as high-speed rail. QUICKWITTEDHARE CONVERSE 20:30, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
Re: high speed rail in the PNW
editPerhaps this is more applicable to a different article, but thought I'd share. ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:31, 2 November 2019 (UTC)



