Talk:PFC Cherno More Varna

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Tormon245t in topic Dispute for the club's history

1913

edit

Отново проява на типичния балкански манталитет в лицето на бургаско-софийските футболни историчари Поне като си променял хронологията на имената, какво се пъчи там 1914-1919. Ти нали бургаски фен на ЦСКА, защо там не напишеш с твоята мила дружка , нова история — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vtd 87.246.52.249 (talk) 05:38, 24 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Гонг.бг

edit

Четете балкански субекти, четете http://gong.bg/view_article.php?article_id=373053 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.246.52.249 (talk) 05:43, 24 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Националното радио

edit

http://bnr.bg/sites/radiobulgaria/Sport/Pages/290512_varna.aspx Ето на бургаски гражданино, дори в националното радио написаха за годините от 1909 до 1914г, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.246.52.249 (talk) 05:53, 24 October 2013 (UTC)VtdReply

Уточнения

edit

Нека бургаския историчар прочете внимателно. През 1912 година на 3 март се формира местният клон на Националния Юношески туристически съюз наречен Галата. прочете ли добре 1912 г.В тази година се появяват пререкания с централното ръководство на този съюз заради отчитането на членския внос.Същевременно в края на 1912-октомври месец, дружеството става изключително популярно и многобройно. На 3 март 1913 при добре посетено учредително събрание се формира Туристическо-Спортно дружество Галата.Месец и половина по-късно името се променя на Река Тича, тоест името е променено през месец май. ТСД Река Тича е ПЪРВИЯТ ОФИЦИАЛЕН СПОРТЕН И ФУТБОЛЕН КЛУБ В БЪЛГАРИЯ.С учредителен протокол, печат и малко по-късно става първия клуб с приет устав.Съдебната регистрация на клуба, в графата учредяване според учредителния протокол е написано 3.03.1913. Едно леко отклонение в съдебната регистрация за така наречения най-стар съществуващ клуб пише...1925 година. От тук нататък би било проява на откровено лицемерие писането на 1945 година като начало на клуба.87.246.52.249 (talk) 06:31, 27 October 2013 (UTC)Велико Димитров87.246.52.249 (talk) 06:31, 27 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Fabricating history

edit

The history of the club founded in 1913 is described in detail. The merger in 1945 is not the founding date and never has been. The centenary celebrations took place in 2013 in attendance of the mayor of Varna and other celebrities. And here we have the old badge of the club with the founding year 1913, until it was replaced with the 4 stars representing the 4 titles in 1925,1926,1934,1938 Okalinov (talk) 19:53, 29 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

SC Ticha was founded in 1913 and SC Vladislav Varna was founded in 1916. These city rivals merged in 1945 as Ticha-Vladislav so that's how Cherno More was established. Simple as that. The celebrations concerned Varna long football history, not PFC Cherno More in particular. What you are doing is trying to fabricate and invent a completely new club history not dealing with true events from that time. These four titles have nothing to do with Cherno More. One belongs to SC Ticha and the other three to Vladislav. So what are you trying to prove exactly?--Rebelheartous (talk) 11:39, 30 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

You should try to read the article first. Ticha and Vladislav have everything to do with Cherno More. A short resume of the 2 clubs before the merger and a more elaborate article on SC Vladislav Varna won't hurt the eyes of any Wikipedia reader. On a contrary, it gives valuable information on the club's history before and after 1945. It is in accordance with the books given in the references underneath. If you want to change the history of the club you should first write a reference book so we can read it. Regards Okalinov (talk) 13:22, 30 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Apparently the rebel-hearted logic only applies to Cherno more Varna, as the majority of the other Bulgarian clubs claim to be established at some point before WWII, but they were also subjected to mergers with other clubs after 9/9/1944. Examples continue as late as 1969 (Levski Sofia and Spartak Sofia; Slavia Sofia and Lokomotiv Sofia), 2001 (Lokomotiv Plovdiv and Velbazhd Kyustendil), 2010 (Botev Plovdiv and Metalik Sopot) and many others. Please refrain from further 'editing' the page as the only thing you achieve is delete other contributors' work. Feel free to write a separate article about the fabricated history of Bulgarian football clubs.  Preceding unsigned comment added by J. Hobart (talkcontribs) 08:14, 12 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Also, Rebelheartous' claim that the 2013 celebrations concerned Varna long football history, not PFC Cherno More in particular. paints hims as rather clueless, which can be easily confirmed with a google search.

http://www.novsport.com/news502871_1.html http://www.varna.utre.bg/gallery/2013/03/02/681-fenove_na_cherno_more_napraviha_shestvie_na_100_godishnia_yubiley/9701 http://www.varna.utre.bg/gallery/2013/03/02/675-unikalna_horeografia_na_ticha/9556 http://dariknews.bg/view_article.php?article_id=1145010 http://www.blitz.bg/sport/bg-futbol/100-godini-cherno-more-snimki_165823.html J. Hobart (talk) 08:38, 12 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

User:Rebelheartous - Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you.  Preceding unsigned comment added by J. Hobart (talkcontribs) 10:12, 12 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

This is a translation of the article on the Bulgarian page. Many references are submitted, most of them from the Year books of the Bulgarian Football Union which was the highest authority issuing club information. If anyone has any questions I will be glad to answer them. Okalinov (talk) 16:25, 20 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Okalinov (talk) 16:25, 20 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Dispute for the club's history

edit

It is clear that there is long standing dispute regarding the history/foundation date of the club, which unfortunately has resulted in several edit wars (the last one from 16 July 2017 and still ongoing as of 9 August). The subject has been highly debated at the bg wiki talk page (in Bulgarian) since 2013. On 17 July 2017, I asked for advice at WP:FOOTY but the discussion there was archived without comments by other users or administrators. Since each Wikipedia is a separate entity and has its own procedures, the discussions that were held and decisions made are for bg wiki alone. I suggest that all parties of the dispute run the discussion again in English, with clean state of mind and the ultimate goal of building consensus. I will try to present the views of the arguing parties, herein called for brevity "1913 camp" and "1945 camp" (no disrespect intended). Please make the necessary amendments if these positions are inaccurate or not clear enough. I hope that more editors will participate in the discussion. Yavorescu (talk) 01:19, 10 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

The 1913 camp

edit

Supported by:

Claim: Cherno More is successor of SC Ticha (1913) and SC Vladislav Varna (1916), two independent clubs which were forcibly merged by the communist regime in 1945, forming TV-45, which was later renamed as Cherno More. Thus, Cherno More's foundation year is 1913, and the "honours" section of the article should include all of the honours won by its predecessors (properly marked as such).

Sources:

  • Cherno More' official website
  • Official editions of the Bulgarian Football Federation (predecessor of the Bulgarian Football Union) where Cherno More is presented as successor of both Ticha and Vladislav and having 4 titles (scanned copies of printed publications available at retro-football.bg)
  • Encyclopedia of Football, Vol.II, by Anatoli Petrov and Petko Pavlov, Elpis Publishing, 1994, ISBN 954-557-0003-X, p.266
  • Bulgarian Football 2004, yearbook published by Bulgarian Football Ltd, 2004, ISSN 1312-4943, p.136–7 (Oddly enough, this is the same publisher as the owner of the 1945 camp's main source, bgclubs.eu – but the statements here and on the website are contradicting)

Additional evidence supporting the claim:

  • BFU's list of champions, which includes Cherno More with 4 titles and explanatory text that Cherno More is successor of Ticha and Vladislav
  • Honorary Diploma, issued by BFU to Ivan Mokanov on 16 September 2013 in connection with the 100th anniversary of PFC Cherno More: File:Ivan Mokanov Honorary Diploma.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
  • An old badge of the club, with 1913 embedded
  • News from various media covering the celebrations of the 100th anniversary in 2013
  • An entire page "50 years ASC Cherno More" in Varna's main newspaper Narodno Delo, issue 272 (5986) from 14 November 1963, including news that in connection with the anniversary the club is awarded with "People's Order of Labor (silver)" by the Presidium of the Parliament of Bulgaria. Another news states that on the occasion of the anniversary various footballers/coaches are given individual awards by the Bureau of the Central Council of the Bulgarian Union of Gymnastics and Sport (the organization governing all sports in the country at that time).

The 1945 camp

edit

Claim: Cherno More was established in 1945 when Ticha and Vladislav merged and cannot claim the history and honours of these clubs. Cherno More's history is from 1945 onwards.

Sources:


Statement by Yavorescu

edit

The case is unique because the merger in 1945 was imposed by a political party having ultimate power at that time; it was not the result of voluntary agreement between the clubs, insolvency, bankruptcy, etc. Nevertheless, it is not uncommon for a club to claim its foundation date to be the one of its predecessors, for example Hamburger SV, SC Freiburg and TSG 1899 Hoffenheim. Certainly, there are counterexamples as well, when a new club is formed after the merger. As far as I know, there is no law or regulation governing such transformations and each country has its own specific practices; furthermore, it seems reasonable to say that each club has its own right to decide whether to become successor of its predecessor(s). This case can be narrowed down to reliability of sources. In my opinion the sources of the 1913 camp have more weight, because they are official publications by an official, independent institution, governing Bulgarian football at that time. They were written by many different authors and published for a period of several decades. Looking at other Wikipedia articles, a citation from the club's official website or an article written by the club's historian is sufficient for determining the foundation date. Here we have confirmation from an official organization.

Rebuttals

edit
  • CSKA Sofia was founded in 1948 by the merger of two clubs, yet they do not claim the history of these clubs. Cherno More should be treated in the same manner.
It does not follow. From its foundation in 1948 until the privatization in the 1990's CSKA was the club of the People's Army, and there was no People's Army before the People's Republic of Bulgaria. Maybe the founders of CSKA wanted to cut all connections to pre-1945 Bulgaria, particularly those leading to the Bulgarian Army during the Kingdom of Bulgaria. In any case, the details of the mergers of CSKA and Cherno More are rather different and analogy is not applicable.
Assuming for the sake of the argument that retro-football.bg is Okalinov's site, that would be a correct statement if the citations were text written by the site's authors/administrators. However, the sources provided are scanned printed publications and Okalinov was not an editor (probably, he wasn't born when some of these editions were published). They are available in public libraries/archives and may not be available online at all. As far as Wikipedia is concerned, sources must be cited correctly; there is no requirement that the sources should be online.
  • BFF publications are not recognized by the BFU because BFU is a separate organization.
I beg to differ. According to the BFU website (translation mine): "BFU is successor of the Bulgarian Football Federation (BFF) (1962-1985)." The term "successor" (Bulgarian: "правоприемник") means exactly this; the successor accepts all assets and liabilities of its predecessor and there is complete connection between the two entities. The very same thing happened between Ticha/Vladislav and Cherno More. Furthermore, BFU lists Cherno More as successor of both Ticha and Vladislav in their list of champions, which only confirms the facts as previously published in the BFF editions.
  • BFU is not authoritative for clubs' history.
That is probably so. But a website with short texts for various Bulgarian clubs (bgclubs.eu) is not authoritative either. It seems to me that a local football federation (member association of UEFA) is the closest possible authority when it comes to clubs' history. When Red Bull purchased and rebranded FC Salzburg in 2005, the new club management claimed that it was a completely new club with no history. However, they were forced by the Austrian Football Association to withdraw that claim and the club's history was subsequently restored. The local football association determines whether a given club is successor of another club, because usually that is done by transferring the membership to the new club/entity.
The citations from the sources directly relate to Cherno More and/or its predecessors, the fact that Cherno More is successor of both these clubs and therefore the content of the article cannot be considered original research. It is true that none of the BFF editions is especially made for Cherno More, but the reader is pointed to the page where the relevant information can be found. Some of the arguments (like the celebrations for the 100th anniversary or Ivan Mokanov's honorary diploma) can be considered original research with a stretch of imagination, if they were the only sources. However, the article's content is not based on them.
  • Reliability of bgclubs.eu
It is true that this website is widely used as source in Wikipedia, that is a fact. However, it is full of inaccuracies and inconsistencies and cannot be considered as reliable or authoritative source of information. (If necessary, I will present at least 5 examples of inaccurate information.) There are no details how the information on clubs' history is gathered and there is no evidence for any of the historical facts presented. I further question the reliability of this source because the same company has published a printed yearbook in 2004, presenting Cherno More as successor of Ticha and Vladislav with four league titles won.
  • Reliability of Soccerway
Soccerway is considered as reliable source for Wikipedia, WP:FOOTY in particular. It is worth mentioning that for Bulgarian football statistics Soccerway's primary source is the Bulgarian football statistics website bulgarian-football.com, and for other details (club's badge, stadium, contacts, history) the primary source is bgclubs.eu. bulgarian-football.com and bgclubs.eu are under the same umbrella, same ownership and mostly the same editor team, so it is not surprising that both bgclubs.eu and soccerway.com claim that Cherno More is founded in 1945. Finally, Soccerway is considered as reliable for football statistics, but as far as I know it has never been regarded as authoritative for clubs' history and foundation dates in particular. It is also inconsistent: claims that Cherno More is founded in 1945, but the trophies include one title from 1937/38, albeit in grey colour.
  • It is paradoxical that Cherno More were champions and runners-up simultaneously.
There is no paradox. At that time, Cherno More's predecessors were independent clubs and participated in the same championship. In fact this is quite common for clubs that were independent and subsequently merged later. For example, in 1938–39 Gauliga Ostmark, SK Admira Wien were champions and SC Wacker were runners-up. The article of the present club FC Admira Wacker Mödling correctly lists all honours, properly marked as won by the respective predecessor clubs. Yavorescu (talk) 06:06, 30 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Yavorescu (talk) 01:19, 10 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Statement by Okalinov

edit

In attempt to break up with the "bourgeoisie past" , all clubs were subjected to mergers by the new government in 1945. Only after the end of the Stalinist era and with the creation of the Bulgarian Union of Gymnastics and Sport (bulg. БСФС) bridges were rebuild and all clubs could claim their descendancy from the pre-War sports establishments. Mergers on Soviet inspired principles were made up until 1969 with not a single one of them resulting in a new foundation date. This includes all Bulgarian teams without exception. There is no reason why exception should be made only in this particlar case. Okalinov (talk) 07:09, 10 August 2017 (UTC)Reply


@Rebelheartous: I've asked several times that you please discuss this matter. I'm going to go ahead and make the change I've described above. If you revert without responding here, then I'm going to have to file a complaint against you at ANI for disruptive editing by reverting without discussing.— Yavorescu (talk) 11:42, 27 October 2017 (UTC).Reply

Update: A discussion is taking place at WP:ANI. Slasher405 (talk) 19:17, 19 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Comment

edit

Why is the article still at 1945? As I see everyone except one editor support 1913, there are also more sources. Linhart (talk) 12:22, 1 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Linhart, what do you suggest? If I revert it, that would be a start of an edit war (or rather, a continuation of the old one). I was hoping for directions from an administrator, but my request at WP:ANI remained unanswered. Yavorescu (talk) 21:56, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
Linhart, The problem is that we have a very determined user who wants single handedly to change the history of the club. He is evading the discussion because he knows he can't win but keeps on revering the page as he likes, using all possible loopholes in the procedures. So far, it seems difficult to get the attention of an administrator but hopefully it will happen sooner or later. Okalinov (talk) 19:49, 6 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
I can't do anything really, I didn't know the situation is like this. If there will be some discussion or vote or something, i will support the 1913 camp. Linhart (talk) 21:47, 7 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
Hi guys, I was mentioned in a DRN about this article. I went through the discussion here as well as (unfortunately) the one in Bulgarian and fail to see a constructive approach by one side in particular. It looks as though only on side is acting constructively and coming up with actual proposals, sources, etc. As this is the case, I really do not see any weight to the other side's stance. Not discussing or assuming the inflammatory approach used over at BG wiki is not a way to build an encycploaedia and it should not be allowed to obstruct said building. As was also mentioned in the DRN I see no reason why the page should not be reverted to the stance that is heavily backed up by sources and that a single user opposes without even entering in discussion. As there is no way to force someone to participate in a discussion, we might just have to restore the version agreed upon by all but one user and hopefully get this one user into a discussion. I wish I could come up with something more constructive, but it seems as though you are running out of options. Unfortunately, I really do not have the time to get involved in an RFC. I have also additional reasons not to get involved with such users (I received a lot of very real off-wiki threats the last time I did). --Laveol T 11:44, 13 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
Laveol, thank you for taking the time to get familiar with our case. That's a lot of reading (some of it unpleasant), so I appreciate that. I understand your reasons why you want to remain uninvolved and I certainly won't insist. The only reason why I prefer a neutral and experienced editor to file the RFC is because I believe it would be better worded and as unbiased as possible. Do you think RFC would help and it's worth filing one? Reverting seems like an aggressive "last resort" option that could be avoided if the RFC is successful. Yavorescu (talk) 21:57, 17 December 2017 (UTC)Reply
RFC is always a good option, I just have the (bad) feeling it might not be enough to avoid an edit war. We already have a case of edit warring against what seems a vast consensus among editors.--Laveol T 10:12, 18 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Official statement of the club

edit

On 5 January 2018, following the correspondence between the football club and bulgarian-football.com/bgclubs.eu, the club's article at bglubs.eu (the 1945 camp's only source) was updated to mention the club's official position and a remark was added below. The remark states that PFC Cherno More expressed its disagreement with www.bgclubs.eu about the reference regarding the history of the club. In response, the chief editor of bgclubs.eu clarified that their site respects the right of every club to have its own position on its history and honours and does not aim to impose bgclubs.eu's interpretation on the historical facts as the only possible and logical one. The site though reserves its rights to a personal and non-engaging interpretation of the events. The full correspondence has been published here (in Bulgarian).

It is my opinion that the discussion ends here. Okalinov (talk) 15:48, 8 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
LOL… Hi, Doc! Nothing ends here! Neither here, nor anywhere! Take a breathe, deeply, be more calm, and STOP gibe with us. As you said, the club's article at bgclubs.eu, was updated to mention the club's official position and a remark was added below. Anyway, the position of the oldest, and the most authoritative Bulgarian football site is, that the year of fondation of Cherno more is 1945, and the best domestic honours are : Bulgarian Cup(2015), and third place(twice) -1953 and 2009. I would like to introduce the editors, how did you call the Chief editor of bgclubs.eu, just 3 months ago. You called him Mr “BOIL”! -- "Сега, кажете ми вие, с какво сайта бг.клъбс е благонадежден източник? От къде черпи информацията си и източниците си. Свободните съчинения на някой си Йордан Цирейов(in English"boil") в този сайт не могат да се нарекат източник изобщо." Okalinov (беседа) 08:32, 12 октомври 2017 (UTC)" . You are 55! A m.d.! Shame on you!Tormon245t (talk) 17:19, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
Not a single source supports your claims. See the remark above Okalinov (talk) 20:15, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
Whopper…The main source, bgclubs.eu [1], indicates, that year of foundation of Cherno more is 1945 and the best domestic honours are : Bulgarian Cup(2015), and third place(twice) -1953 and 2009. You don’t say the truth, Mr Kalinov. Tormon245t (talk) 17:26, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
Tormon, I seriously suggest you stopped with the attacks, especially ones based on personal information. The next time I see you posting something like this you're going straight to the administrator noticeboard.--Laveol T 21:35, 9 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
I don’t understand what kind of “attack” is there, Laveol. All, what I wrote, is the truth. I’m not kidding, and I’m not lier! And, also, the information is not personal, but a public one. You, personaly, may to check this. I intend to inform You, that all the Okalinov’s editions are deleted from main Bulgarian article. The same article, for his sake, is temporary locked and is under procedure…Tormon245t (talk) 16:34, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
The user has not disclosed any personal information on this wiki. You should hence respect his privacy. --Laveol T 22:49, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
I’m quite respect this privacy, and I share the same! But, let me check Your sense of humour. What about this? Sincerely, I am very RESPECT of YOU,Laveol, that You was hereby awarded the Saint Cyril and Methodius Order of Merit, for Your countless contributions and efforts to maintain the good tone on Bulgaria&Macedonia-related topics. One of my best friends was also hereby awarded the same Order of Merit, in 2010, Valdi Totev.So, I check the list of awarded persons for 2008, and I established, that the only person, wich was awarded in april is Acad. Evgeniy Golovinski. Is this correct?Tormon245t (talk) 17:31, 18 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
1. You are aware that a wiki barnstar is nothing like an actual national award?
2. This has nothing to do with you harassing other users. --Laveol T 21:03, 18 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
1. Oh, I wasn't aware of the term "Barnstar". Besides that, I am totaly respectfull towards Your positions and awards, Laveol.
2. I don't think that I have insulted anyone. If You think, that I have done so, please, accept my deep and sincere appologies.Tormon245t (talk) 15:23, 19 January 2018 (UTC)Reply