Talk:Open Archives Initiative
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editwhat is difference between OAI and open access? As i know the one thing is that OAI is a tool for Open Access
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Wikiwizzy/Archive1#Update_feed Brief mention of plans for a Wikipedia-OAI --Historiograf 01:40, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Open Archives Initiative. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100314214736/http://oai.sdu.edu.tr/ to http://oai.sdu.edu.tr/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090628103036/http://www.openarchives.eu/ to http://www.openarchives.eu/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:52, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Past tense?
editThe tone of the article implies the organization is long-dead — are there sources to support this?
- At least one of the discussion lists listed on their official web site are still active as of June 2022.
- The ResourceSync Framework Specification, (ANSI/NISO Z39.99-2017), is from only several years ago.
— Jim Grisham (talk) 00:50, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
- The discussion list is still active as of May 2025, the latest thread contains informations about updating links to register to the OAI. According to the official website, "[t]he Open Archives Initiative is no longer working on new projects" – that may be the reason of the past tense. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 20:03, 7 June 2025 (UTC)