Talk:Nina Lath Gupta
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Conflict of Interest edit request — removal of defamatory unsourced content (BLP violation)
edit| The user below has a request that an edit be made to Nina Lath Gupta. That user has an actual or apparent conflict of interest. The requested edits backlog is very high. Please be extremely patient. There are currently 534 requests waiting for review. Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies. |
- What should be changed:
1. Remove the sentence "In 2025 Supreme Court of India fine her of 10lakh and sentenced her for 1 year." — this is entirely fabricated. 2. Remove the sentence "Cinevesture failed and now she is thinking to launch something new." — this is unsourced and false. 3. Change "NDFC" to "NFDC" in all instances (correct name is National Film Development Corporation). 4. Change "Dehli Hight Court" to "Delhi High Court" (spelling correction).
- Why it should be changed:
I am the subject of this article. Items 1 and 2 are fabricated, unsourced, and defamatory, in violation of WP:BLP. No Supreme Court order imposing a fine or sentence exists. The only relevant orders are SLP(C) No. 16902/2024 (12 August 2024) and Review Petition (C) No. 1822/2024 (17 October 2024), both of which dismissed the Union of India's appeal. These orders are already cited in the article. Items 3 and 4 are factual corrections. The defamatory edits were added on 14 May 2026 by temporary account ~2026-28903-36.
- References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button):
SLP(C) No. 16902/2024 — Supreme Court Order, 12 August 2024 Review Petition (C) No. 1822/2024 — Supreme Court Order, 17 October 2024
~2026-39243-31 (talk) 18:11, 12 July 2026 (UTC)
References
