Talk:Nick Fuentes/Archive 7

Archive 1

←

Archive 5

Archive 6

Archive 7

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 14 January 2026

Change the current lead image From: File:Nick_Fuentes_[current_image_name].jpg To: A more recent, higher-quality freely licensed photograph Reason: The existing image is outdated and of low resolution. Per BLP and image use policies, the lead image should reflect the subject’s current appearance when a suitable free image is available CosmicEnlightenment (talk) 01:49, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Not done for now: This is not an actionable proposal. No suitable free image is being proposed. Grayfell (talk) 02:01, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

If possible, I suggest

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/23/Nick_Fuentes_from_2025.png CosmicEnlightenment (talk) 02:21, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

That appears to be a copyright violation. Screenshots without attribution or even a proper link to the source video are not suitable. Grayfell (talk) 03:39, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Is the current photo allowed?

The photo which has been inserted to the article, in commons says the following:

This file does not appear to have a copyright tag. Copyright tagging is required in order to provide a consistent way to identify the copyright status of files, and to allow for automated classification of files. This template should be replaced with the appropriate copyright tag. Failure to tag a file may lead to its deletion. If you have any questions, please see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

This file does not have information on its copyright and licensing status.

Unless the copyright and licensing status is provided, the file will be deleted after Wednesday, 21 January 2026. Please remove this template if a correct copyright license tag has been added.

Is this a copyright violation? Should this photo stay or be removed? Wikieditor662 (talk) 16:44, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

I've reverted. It's a clear-cut WP:COPYVIO. Grayfell (talk) 00:19, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

Request for clarification and reliable sourcing

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The article states that Mr. Fuentes is a white supremacist; however, I do not see sufficient evidence presented in the article to support this classification. Wikipedia is intended to present verifiable facts supported by reliable sources, and such a serious label should be clearly substantiated. Similarly, the article refers to his alleged denial of the Holocaust, yet no direct quotations or reliable sources are provided that clearly demonstrate this claim. Please do better Wikipedia! Daniel Weissel (talk) 17:55, 15 January 2026 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Channel?

I've noticed that usually articles about people known for streaming or websites have a link to their stream or website in their infobox. Should his channel be added onto there? Wikieditor662 (talk) 23:10, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

catboi kami date

should this be added? ~2025-42184-56 (talk) 13:53, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

When I do a quick internet search, most of what I get is social media. Unless there are several WP:RS describing it as a date, it seems like it's not notable. EducatedRedneck (talk) 14:19, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

It just wasnt a date and the only people you can find saying that are biased people on twitter who think hes gay or something, the clip doesnt imply a date and a Far-Right livestreamer who advocates for the death of homosexuals would not go on a homosexual date and make himself look bad ChristIsKing200 (talk) 02:39, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

There have only been some news article covering "Catboi Kami", but they do not mention the so-called "date" between him and Fuentes. "Catboi Kami", otherwise known as Tor Gustafsson Brookes, was actually a pretty high-power right-wing figure.

Here are the links to the articles: Alex Jones on alleged FBI monitoring of Nick Fuentes: ‘It’s a trap’ | Southern Poverty Law Center and Catboy Kami: How an internet troll went from an Ipswich bedroom to the heart of the US far-right movement - ABC News RottenEgg780 (talk) 22:54, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Is that really the best picture you guys had of the guy

I feel like better could be done, it's too funny and low quality ~2025-43875-80 (talk) 23:35, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

please see Talk:Nick Fuentes/Archive 6#Infobox photograph 2, Talk:Nick Fuentes/Archive 6#Why does the image suck so bad, Talk:Nick Fuentes/Archive 6#Update image and so on, this is the best free one we have ser! ^{(chat to me - see my edits)} 23:43, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

thank you! ~2025-43875-80 (talk) 03:10, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Couldn't we use one off of Getty Images or something? They allow for noncommercial use and say for stuff such as books and noncommercial websites you're allowed to. ChristIsKing200 (talk) 02:42, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

No. Per WP:IUP the images either need to be free use or fair use. EvergreenFir (talk) 05:29, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Yes, since most photos of Fuentes are copyrighted. You cannot take screenshots from his streams, photos from news articles are not allowed, no AI-generated images, and no uploads of copyrighted press photos; thus, the only solution is if the photographers themselves upload their images under a CC license. RottenEgg780 (talk) 22:51, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Minor edits to the lead-in section

These are just some recommendations for improving the lead-in section. RottenEgg780 (talk)

Please sign every comment. And I hate to keep reacting myself, but the lead is a summary of the body per WP:MOSLEAD. We do not modify the lead first, we build the body and then summarise the body in the lead. You are inserting some things in the lead that are either minor points, not covered in the body, nor extensively in the WP:RS. For example, the mention of his holocaust 'cookie' comments are not necessary to put in the lead, especially the first paragraph because it uses up valuable space that could better be used for summarising other points. We need only state that he promotes holocaust denial. If there are adjustments you want to make, it will be easier to adjust them one at a time. Zenomonoz (talk) 00:53, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Some more feedback since I have time. There seems to be some redundancy with your proposed shift in paragraphs two and four. Specifically, your second paragraph notes his growing influence on the right, and then in p4 you have again got the sentence about NYTimes and Atlantic noting his growing influence on the political right. Zenomonoz (talk) 01:13, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

I have made some changes to the second paragraph of the live article. Hopefully this will make it more chronological. E.g. it didn't clarify when he began supporting Donald Trump. Zenomonoz (talk) 01:32, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your comments, suggestions, and modifications of the article, Zenomonoz. You have cleared up much of my confusion when it came to reading the article. You have done a good job in terms of making the article more productive.

You are right about the growing influence part. Do you have any recommendations for where that claim about the Groypers being 30-40% of young Republicans could go?

I will list out some edits that I think could be helpful for the sake of neutrality and brevity in the lead-in section; I have bolded the three main changes that I want to make:

(1) "Nicholas Joseph Fuentes (born August 18, 1998) is an American political commentator, white nationalist activist, and live streamer who has been described as far-right."

(2) "He hosts America First, a livestream that, according to multiple sources, has promoted Christian nationalism, white supremacy, the incel movement, misogyny, anti‑LGBTQ views, and antisemitism, including Holocaust denial."

(3) "His supporters are known as Groypers, an online‑organized far‑right subculture that uses coordinated questioning, meme‑based rhetoric, and confrontational tactics to challenge mainstream conservative figures." (Important, in my opinion, to highlight as Groypers spread his name and have some level of influence; this should also provide context to the term "Groyper". RottenEgg780 (talk) 03:09, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 4 Feb 2026

Add {{distinguish|Nick Freitas}} to top of article. Very similar sounding names and have been mixed up in my experience. AwakenedAmerican1776 (talk) 19:39, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

 Done Day Creature (talk) 20:24, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

AFPAC

Davefelmer, sorry but this requires citation in the body. If it has since been discontinued, then will need WP:RS to cover that, or you can cite a statement from one of Fuentes channels, as WP:ABOUTSELF applies. Either way, it would need to go in the body first. Zenomonoz (talk) 21:33, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Incel movement

@Binksternet: and @Davefelmer:, the information regarding Nick Fuentes' championing of the incel movement was yet deleted again. Zakaria ښه راغلاست (talk) 06:12, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

The incel movement is covered in the body, and it's a single sentence... that doesn't strike me as enough content to warrant inclusion in the lead. The lead is a summary of the body. IMO, the lead is already pretty well written as is. Zenomonoz (talk) 08:36, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

The incel movement is very important to this topic and must be presented more strongly in the article body and lead section. Sources describe the incel stuff as foundational to Fuentes. See the above discussion at Talk:Nick_Fuentes#"Incel"_in_lead. "Most important for Fuentes's brand is that he is a young 'incel'... Fuentes uses his position as an incel to connect with down-and-out young men..." Et cetera. Binksternet (talk) 13:24, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Binksternet I have reverted you again. I understand the sentiment, but WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY applies. Neither of the two sources next to you 'the incel movement' were even used in the body, nor is this discussed in the body. You are missing the point. The body having a single sentence stating that he is a "proud incel" is not sufficient content to be summarised in the body as "promoting" the "incel movement". Again, I recommend you adhere to WP:MOS regarding the lead. You're going to need to add more content about his apparent promotion of the incel movement to the body before it is included. Zenomonoz (talk) 19:44, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Are you objecting to any text about incel or is this basically procedural? Because if it isn’t procedural why not add material to the body of the article yourself? Doug Weller talk 20:17, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Doug Weller, largely procedural. I don't have the time or interest to go searching for sources. The burden is on the editors who keep adding it in. The two sources that were used in the lead do not speak of Fuentes promoting the 'incel movement', they make brief mention of his statement defining himself as an incel. So it feels like no users can be bothered to adjust the body of article before inserting things into the lead, and also adhere to WP:RS. Zenomonoz (talk) 03:22, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

That's fine. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 09:49, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

@Binksternet: I am once again removing your inclusion of 'incel movement' in the opening. The two sources you cited do not mention him being a proponent of the incel movement on his show. They only briefly state that he personally identifies as an 'incel'. This is a WP:SYTH issue, and not worthy of inclusion in the lead. Zenomonoz (talk) 21:20, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

Yeah, so this is now moving into tendentious editing territory. The lead section does not need citations; some citations may be provided for convenience but they are not required. Rather, the lead section is a summary of article text which is supported by cites. These cites describe the incel movement as critically important to Fuentes. The time has come for you to declare why it is that you don't want our readers to know that Fuentes used the incel movement for his own gain. Binksternet (talk) 22:58, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Binksternet, you inserted the sources into the lead. If you don't need them, then don't use them. If there is sufficient coverage of him being a proponent of inceldom in the body, then mention that in the lead on its own. I'm only going to check the sources you put in the lead. Just do things properly instead of making this personal? Zenomonoz (talk) 23:01, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

It's personal because of your tendentious editing. You have repeatedly refused to acknowledge that there are high quality sources describing how Fuentes and the incel movement are integrally linked. Why are you acting this way? Binksternet (talk) 23:07, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Binksternet, sorry but you cannot expect editors to check beyond the things you insert. When you insert new labels with sources, I'm going to check those and edit on that basis.

In addition, there is a tag on the lead stating that users should not insert new labels without consensus on the talk page first. We have already worked to trim down an excessively long list of labels, and users are now adding them back in – turning this into a rationalwiki-esque list of labels. It would be more sensible to have these things spread through the lead rather than concentrated in a single sentence, but for now that isn't the case. This style of lead doesn't occur on the pages of many other far right figures, because a lot of this just becomes redundant and it sounds silly. Zenomonoz (talk) 23:11, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

And I have reluctantly indicated that you can add back "incel movement" into the lead if you wish, just without those sources on it. Zenomonoz (talk) 23:13, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

Yes, I can always expect that an edit to the lead section of a page will be considered in the context of whether or not the edit properly summarizes the topic. That's the whole point of the encyclopedia. We are not here to argue points of order. Binksternet (talk) 23:18, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

When people do put refs in the lead, it is to aide readers who might dispute it's occurrence in the lead. So that ref better actually match what is mentioned. Zenomonoz (talk) 23:25, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

The 'white supremacist despite being hispanic' thing

Hi Davefelmer, I'm hoping you might stop the slow edit war over your continued insertion of this. Two of the sources only mention Fuentes in passing, and one of them is a short university press release. The only suitable one here is the Moses source, which actually discusses Fuentes ethnicity in relation to his activism.

I have rephrased the body to mention this Moses source and attributed it to her, rather than 'academic publications'. A single source discussing this isn't worth a mention in the first paragraph. Wikipedia is not rationalwiki, so we are not here for this kind of gotcha language ("despite"). Yes, many white nationalists have non-white ancestry, and Fuentes is upfront about that. It isn't our job to be putting words like 'despite' into WP:VOICE without attribution though. That is the language of an op-ed, not an encylopedia. Thus, I have attributed it to Moses in the body, but I don't see why a partial hispanic ancestry is worthy of mention in the lead at all. Zenomonoz (talk) 01:15, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

The information is supported as much as him promoting the incel movement is, and that was considered WP:DUE for the lead. I see no basis for the same standard not applying here. Furthermore, it's important in a general sense as it goes to the core of who he is as a person. He's a white nationalist leader when he historically would not be part of a white nationalist vision. Davefelmer (talk) 23:09, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

@Davefelmer, I think it would make more sense to have that information after his Hispanic ancestry within the body section under a header, not the lead-in section. The lead-in section should only be for the most important of details, summarizing the most widely covered, central aspects of Nick Fuentes. Would love to hear your thoughts on this. Also, the "despite being a Hispanic thing" could come off as being editorial in nature, which could be seen as a "gotcha" or op-ed tone policy. RottenEgg780 (talk) 00:02, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

This is almost word-for-word what Zenomonoz (talk) wrote, not sure what it's trying to add. The fact of the matter is that content with as much sourcing as the above is already included in the lead ie the incel movement stuff or the NYT/Atlantic saying he's a growing influence on the right. In fact, Zenomonoz already opposed the incel stuff on that basis before seemingly dropping his opposition. So there is no basis for not including this.

And I don't understand what you're trying to say re the Hispanic thing. All of the sources emphasize, essentially, the point that he is a white supremacist despite his ancestry historically excluding him from those circles. He's not your garden variety white nationalist, and as such it is WP:NOTABLE to his biography considering pushing the ideology is basically the sum total of what he does. If you have an issue with language we can adjust it (ie use 'while' instead of 'despite'). Davefelmer (talk) 23:37, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

@Davefelmer:, the Zenomonoz is removing this when he doesn't have the consensus to do so. It is notable that he is of Mexican American heritage, but advocating white nationalism. Nick Fuentes is a leader of the incel movement. Zakaria ښه راغلاست (talk) 04:47, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Look, RottenEgg780 and I have agreed that the specific sentence Davefelmer wrote isn't for the lead on the basis of coverage in sources, as per guidelines for WP:BLP, WP:MOSLEAD and WP:TONE. You're bringing up unrelated issues. The lead already clearly states he advocates white nationalism, and I have done nothing to remove that. Zenomonoz (talk) 07:49, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

And several other editors have disagreed. What is unrelated about what he said? Davefelmer (talk) 01:44, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

"the point that he is a white supremacist despite his ancestry historically excluding him from those circles" – ok, but Wikipedia isn't here to make a point. We are not here to WP:RIGHTINGGREATWRONGS and expose hypocrisy. The point is to reflect the WP:RS. One academic source is not worthy of mention in the lead. Most people know 'Fuentes' is a Spanish/Mexican last name. Zenomonoz (talk) 08:03, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

What on Earth are you talking about? Numerous sources cover it and make the point which is why it's relevant. You would know because you deleted several of them, but there are plenty of others. Davefelmer (talk) 01:51, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

I did not "delete several of them", I removed two which did not support the statement you wrote. It was WP:SYNTH. Zenomonoz (talk) 03:36, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

American fascists

Why is Fuentes not included in the American fascists category despite often being described as such and founding the fascist Groypers movement? JPHC2003 (talk) 00:03, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Go ahead and add him. Simonm223 (talk) 00:05, 13 February 2026 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 17 February 2026

I request that "White Supremacy" be taken out of the movement section of this page, as if this were to be written by someone who actually watched any of Nick's show they would know that Nick Fuentes is not in fact a white supremacist and states that if you have any hate for an individual solely because of their race you do not belong in his movement. ProspectAvenue (talk) 05:37, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want made. EvergreenFir (talk) 06:20, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Wiki-lies

Fuentes’ father didn’t immigrate, he was born in America ~2026-10873-02 (talk) 03:11, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

If you want the article to be updated with this information, please provide a reliable source that supports your claim. 🍅 fx (talk) 01:47, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

It's possible IP editor has a point. Sharon Moses is the only source here that claims his father "his father is half Mexican and immigrated to the United States". To source this, she cites this Axios piece, which does not confirm his father "immigrated' to the United States. It says his father is "half Mexican American". There is nothing about immigrating. It's quite plausible this only meant of Mexican descent. The NY times piece says "his father is half Mexican". This doesn't confirm he immigrated to the US, it could well just mean he has Mexican ancestry.

To avoid any possibility of error, I'll tweak the source to say Mexican American with the NY Times, and remove the Moses source. Zenomonoz (talk) 02:16, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Higher Resolution

Add a picture with a higher resolution ~2026-11229-92 (talk) 17:32, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

If you look at the previous discussions you will see that we already tried to find one that was suitably licensed and we couldn't find anything that was better than we already had. All the better pictures had licensing problems. --DanielRigal (talk) 17:48, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 21 February 2026

Remove "He has said, "You're either a Catholic or you're with the Jews"". This quote is unsourced, and web-searching for this in quotations did not reveal any sources of Nick Fuentes saying this phrase. ~2026-11703-38 (talk) 18:33, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

found a source and added it. https://www.nationalreview.com/2022/11/guess-who-came-to-dinner/ Cannolis (talk) 20:35, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 18 February 2026

Change logo from File:America First with Nick Fuentes logo.jpg to File:America_First_with_Nick_Fuentes_new_logo.svg ~2026-10834-93 (talk) 04:26, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

 Not done: Please provide a valid reason on why the image should be changed. Speedrunz (talk) 02:58, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Because the the new image is one with logo that's actually used today --~2026-11556-02 (talk) 03:59, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

Could you provide an example where I could check this? Slomo666 (talk) 18:13, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Comment

Good actions only - we don't remove 'holocaust denier' based upon his Piers Morgan appearance. Fuentes was clearly being facetious in that interview, as he said "it could be one-hundred times more than" 6 million. Saying that '6 billion' or '6 quadrillion' died is a holocaust denial meme. Fuentes is only signalling to his audience, and Piers Morgan was clueless about it. Zenomonoz (talk) 23:56, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

@Zenomonoz: Ok i understand. Perhaps its something to look at in the future as i anecdotally think there was other instances where he has agreed to the 6 million number. But i do not have memory of what you said it's been a while since i watched the interview.

It is speculation from both sides as we cant really know what he really thinks and i don't know if judging off of his tone is fair (perhaps WP:NOR).

And it just felt off to me seeing sources for him being a holocaust denier as sites just calling him that.

I am just clearing up my logic about it all. Thanks. Good actions only (talk) 01:10, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

No, it's not speculation, we are aware of the "jokes" Holocaust deniers like to use. For additional clarification see the Sartre quote on my userpage. Simonm223 (talk) 01:31, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

This discussion is done (and i am not pushing for the edit to get undone) but i just want to let you know as a fact that would still fall under WP:NOR if implemented as a reason to continue to call him that. Good actions only (talk) 14:21, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Requested edit to personal life section

Is there a single other BLP on Wikipedia where the personal life section discusses whether or not they are a virgin? This seems like an attack piece I suggest the personal life section is rewritten Lsbstian77 (talk) 04:37, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Lsbstian77 – yeah the sentence "and thus has never had sex" after mentioning the term incel is redundant and reads weird. Removed.

Zenomonoz (talk) 04:55, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Fuentes’s Views on the far left and Communism

There is evidence, from what he has said that he supports a union between the far right and far left, and has glorified Stalin. National Socialism (Nazism) with left wing economic polices, I think he now talks about. Ajron Bach (talk) 17:27, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

Well it's important to note he's also publicaly said that Stalin was a bad person who commited genocide, his praise does not come from support of leftist ideologies rather admiration of Stalin himself thinking he's "cool." He's typically seen having somewhat center-left economic policy.

Hes also heavily denounced communism. KamilPedia (talk) 16:48, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Okay, thank you Ajron Bach (talk) 07:24, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

I am sorry @Ajron Bach but you are mistaken about the economic policies of Naziism. Alexander Reid Ross's book Against the Fascist Creep explores far-right syncretism and entryism in a very easy, 101 level manner. I would recommend you read it. Simonm223 (talk) 18:37, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Danke, I will give it a read. 👍 Ajron Bach (talk) 07:24, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 6 April 2026

Change the picture of Nick to Nick_Fuentes.jpg so that a more recent and better quality photo is featured. Midnightfrosting (talk) 10:55, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

 Not done: The licensing information for that image on Commons appears to be incorrect. You have described it as your own work when it appears to be a screenshot from a video and is likely protected by copyright. Day Creature (talk) 14:01, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Possible mentioning of parents

Hello. I just wanted to see if I could get a consensus about possibly adding information about Nick Fuentes's parents' apparent racial prejudices into the early life section. This would be two to three sentences at most. I think it is important because children can be inspired by their parents.

Link: https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2023/01/nick-fuentes/

Quote: "His parents supported Nick as he broadcast racist livestreams from their basement. In one, he said that, growing up, his family avoided Applebee’s and Red Lobster because they were "commonly known as Black fare," adding that they shared a saying about Olive Garden that contained the n-word. In December 2021, his mother phoned in to his show to speculate on the race of a man who’d opened fire in a mall near her home. "What flavor do you think that shooting was?" Lauren Fuentes asked. "You know what I mean." Before hanging up, in a laughing moment, she insisted Nick had learned anti-Black prejudice "from your dad."

@R. G. Checkers wrote a comment, saying, "Mother Jones is considered generally reliable, but WP:RSP notes it is biased on politics and it advises caution on placing weight on it and suggests possible attribution. I don't think attribution is necessay since this is verified, since its literally just quoting his show. The weight question is more difficult. Basically the situation is Mother Jones and low-quality The Patch have covered this Applebee's story (MJ links The Patch in the article btw). Is it relevant? Well, it is not basic biographical information common in early life sections, but that fact is not a disqualifer alone. I tend to agree that it is relevant considering what he is known for, but it is also should be noted that it is bringing in non-public figure BLPs in a contentious context with non-ideal sourcing. I think it is reasonable to look at it either way. So, I officicially declare myself neutral at this point."

Sincerely, RottenEgg780 (talk) RottenEgg780 RottenEgg780 (talk) 04:10, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

I would caution against including anything regarding his parents without multiple, uncontroversial sources. They are still private individuals, after all. guninvalid (talk) 06:16, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

I suppose the only sources are from the Patch and the Mother Jones article (who references the Patch article anyways). I think the best course of action is to not add anything about his parents to the article after-all; thank you for your response. RottenEgg780 (talk) 06:49, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Would direct quotes from the parents themselves be more valuable? SPLC has a good article: https://www.splcenter.org/resources/hatewatch/nick-fuentes-trades-parents-basement-pricey-livestreaming-den/.

"Lauren Fuentes, Nick’s mother, has called into his livestream at least twice. In a Christmas broadcast in December 2021, she opened a five-minute conversation by telling him, "I wanted to tell all of your Groypers Merry Christmas and how much I love all of them, right?" RottenEgg780 (talk) 06:58, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Upgrade to B-Class from C? (done)

I believe that this article should be upgraded from C-class to B-class. I believe that it can even reach a higher class than B-class, but that is a discussion for another day. The article, as a whole, has been substantially improved -- thank you for everyone's hard work.

The six requirements for a B-class: it "is suitably referenced, with inline citations," "reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies," "has a defined structure," "is reasonably well-written," "contains supporting materials where appropriate," and "presents its content in an appropriately understandable way."

Link to B-Class criteria here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Content_assessment/B-Class_criteria.

Let me know if you have any questions. RottenEgg780 (talk) 23:49, 20 April 2026 (UTC) RottenEgg780

@RottenEgg780 I agree with this. If you want, you can rate the article yourself, see WP:RATER.

Hope this helps! 1timeuse75 (talk) 16:22, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Can someone fix a typo please?

I don't have the ability to edit this page. Under the heading "Deplatforming and Reinstatements", there is a sentence talking about a pilot program YouTube had to reinstate banned accounts. It says "reinstat". Bcs491 (talk) 04:25, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Looks like this has been done although I'm not sure as to the exact edit that fixed it. Simonm223 (talk) 12:43, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 28 April 2026

Why is the image in the infobox the most low-quality image of Nick out there? Lol, we need to upload a higher resolution picture. ~2026-78567-5 (talk) 12:40, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

• At the moment that's the best we have. Sorry. Simonm223 (talk) 12:41, 28 April 2026 (UTC)