Talk:Natasha Walter
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ruth Oppenheim
editNatasha Walter's bio is missing references to the females in her life including her own mother. That we are all born of woman is an egregious oversight. Why is it that in all things, men overshadow women? This is the biography of a feminist author. The women likely played a larger role in her development. Ruth deserves her place on this page. Parents? And only one mattered? Give me a break. 98.255.62.143 (talk) 08:39, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Request for additions
editRequest to update
edit![]() | This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. Some or all of the changes appear to have been generated by a large language model. See Wikipedia:Large language models for information on using LLMs in Wikipedia. |
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. | |
|
I am requesting these changes here rather than editing the page directly as I have a conflict of interest. I would be grateful if an editor could consider the following updates, all supported by reliable sources: 1. **Addition of new book** Please add the following book to the lead and works section:
Suggested wording for body:
And in Works:
2. **Addition to Career** Please add:
3. **Additions to Recognition section** Please add the following to the Recognition section:
These are intended as factual updates only. I have kept the wording neutral and consistent with the existing article style. Many thanks for your time and consideration. ~2026-18695-78 (talk) 12:16, 25 March 2026 (UTC) ~2026-18695-78 (talk) 12:16, 25 March 2026 (UTC) References
| |
- I've updated the edit request to use the {{COI request edit}} template. meamemg (talk) 14:21, 25 March 2026 (UTC)
Not done: your request appears to have been generated by a large language model. MediaKyle (talk) 15:59, 4 May 2026 (UTC)


