Talk:Nadeo

Reviewer Note

Some of the Ubisoft subsidiaries have articles, and some don't. I am accepting this one. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:26, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Pronunciation

Why isn't pronunciation in IPA? 2603:7080:3801:2C18:C5C6:912D:5229:622E (talk) 11:47, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Notability

@IceWelder: I believe that this article does meet the standard notability. In the page its sayd "An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources." This article has a lot of secondary sources, which make me believe it is indeed notable. Martin^talk(sign) 20:18, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

The number of sources alone isn't strictly relevant, rather there should be singificant coverage, as you quoted, winthin these sources. The majority of the refs are about Ubisoft or TrackMania, with Nadeo mentioned off-handedly. This lack of coverage is reflected in how little we thus far could write about the studio itself. IceWelder [✉] 20:39, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Why Ubisoft bought Nadeo

In 2008, Nadeo released 2 TrackMania games, TrackMania Nations Forever and TrackMania United Forever. They hoped people would first download Nations Forever and would later buy United Forever for other features, but that almost never happened. Nadeo missed out on a lot of money, and were later bought by Ubisoft.

This is a claim. Do not use this as a viable source until evidence is found. CycloneTheta (talk) 23:49, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

So what should we do with this? What is the source? IceWelder [✉] 06:07, 10 December 2025 (UTC)