Talk:Museum of Goa
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Museum of Goa article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | A fact from Museum of Goa appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 January 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Conflict of Interest
editThis article's origins as self-promotion by the gallery's owner Subodh Kerkar (User:Subodhkerkar)are discussed at Template:Did you know nominations/Museum of Goa. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:08, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
The gallery is not wholly conventional in nature?
editA sentence here reads "The gallery is not wholly conventional in nature, and encourages experimental ideas". However, that doesn't seem to be actually saying anything: is it not entirely conventional for a contemporary art gallery to encourage experimental ideas? That's what they usually do; if they didn't they probably wouldn't be considered "contemporary". I see no reason to keep this sentence unless there's convincing evidence that the gallery is really unconventional . Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:39, 29 February 2016 (UTC)