Talk:Munnuru Kapu
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
 | You are an administrator, so you may disregard the message below You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If admin}}
You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of your common.css page: .ECR-edit-request-warning {
display: none;
}
Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit request This article is related to caste-related topics in South Asia, which is subject to the extended-confirmed restriction. You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.) |
| Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. The entire article relates to the following contentious topics:
The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
Arbitrary heading
editMinor English syntax edits. AbbyMay (talk) 03:01, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
Wallace McDonald (talk) 01:34, 23 July 2014 (UTC)I rewrote the entire article to correct the English. I tried to make the list of important persons consistent in format, which it wasn't before, but I'm not sure whether the forms I adopted are standard. There's one sentence in the introduction I couldn't make sense of, about the Moslem invasion.
Telugu source
editThis book is much cited in the article. There are several problems:
- The publisher etc is not given
- We have no idea of the credentials of the author - are they a reliable source? Are they affiliated to the Kapus?
- We have no idea what page is being cited for each point
- For the vast majority of readers of English-language Wikipedia, the source is useless because it is not written in the English language. That is not a problem in itself but, in particular bearing in mind that caste articles are prone to very poor use of sources etc, we really do need translations for the various points. Better still would be modern English-language sources that could replace this thing. - Sitush (talk) 01:44, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
- I have removed it for now. I'm pretty sure it is unreliable. - Sitush (talk) 08:15, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 9 February 2026
edit | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove “Other Backwards Class” it is in error & negatively affect my life for marriage prospects. It is a Forward caste of farmers, businessmen, & workers for the king of Nizam.
It also includes a grammy winner named Kanukuntla Subhash Chandrabose Sundown99 (talk) 02:22, 9 February 2026 (UTC)
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want made. Day Creature (talk) 04:59, 9 February 2026 (UTC)