Talk:Mount Hutt

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mountains Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Requested move

Latest comment: 14 years ago5 comments5 people in discussion

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to Mount Hutt. Favonian (talk) 15:48, 10 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Mount Hutt (New Zealand) → Mount Hutt – I can't see why the article is disambiguated. Schwede 66 18:52, 3 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Support the only article I can find that is even remotely close to this one is Mount Hutton, New South Wales and I don't think that is similar enough to require a disambiguation here. I also noticed that the page was originally at Mount Hutt, New Zealand and was moved here due to changes at Wikipedia:Naming conventions (New Zealand). That page however, mentions that no disambiguation is needed if the place name is unique and it appears to be the case for this mountain.--70.24.208.34 (talk) 01:13, 4 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Support: no other article present... if there was one... the target should have been a disambiguation and not a redirect back to this. --lTopGunl (talk) 10:47, 4 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Support per nom. No ambiguity. - Darwinek (talk) 10:51, 4 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

What's the original name?

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The lede says Opuke and the 2nd paragraph says Ōpuke. Neither are referenced. -- haminoon (talk) 03:17, 27 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Haminoon: The New Zealand Gazetteer (see link in Wikidata) says that "Mount Hutt" is not an official name but does not record the prior name. My edition of Place Names of New Zealand is from 2010 (I believe it's the latest edition, but I could be wrong; pp 177–178) and does say that Opuke is the Māori name (with the translation 'o' meaning 'place of' and 'puke' meaning 'hill'). 2010 was the pre-macron era and the editor, Peter Dowling, didn't use them. Hence I cannot resolve that aspect for you – sorry. Schwede 66 04:21, 27 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic