Talk:Mohamed Gad-el-Hak
| The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
| This article was nominated for deletion on 18 September 2020. The result of the discussion was WP:SNOW keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Came here from ANI
editIt's very clear that this person has done extensive, undisclosed COI edits to this article. The list of scholarly achievements is copied from his resume. There are multiple other issues with the layout and detail of this page. I am going to watch the ANI case closely, as I think a topic ban at least should be instituted. If any editors are up for it, ping me and I'd be happy to help work on this article once the COI thing is resolved. On a personal note, I'm pretty shocked that someone so high up in academia would think it's ethical/appropriate to edit Wikipedia about themselves. That's a pretty big no-no in academic circles in general. MrAureliusRTalk! 20:54, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
- MrAureliusR They have now been blocked. I'd say WP:BEBOLD and edit the article as you see fit. I've made a start, but still a lot to do. -Kj cheetham (talk) 18:23, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Alright, I took a knife to the article. I think a lot more still needs to be removed. I am not even convinced that he meets notability, but erring on the side of caution for now. Only things that can be found in references not published by him should be kept. That would eliminate most of the article as it is, but better references need to be found. https://egr.vcu.edu/directory/mohamedgadelhak/ is a possible reference for basic info. I would like to get the article to a state where we can completely remove his resume and self-published website as references, as they are very clearly primary (and likely biased) sources. MrAureliusRTalk! 03:21, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- Definitely notable under WP:NPROF it looks like. -Kj cheetham (talk) 07:25, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- Alright, I took a knife to the article. I think a lot more still needs to be removed. I am not even convinced that he meets notability, but erring on the side of caution for now. Only things that can be found in references not published by him should be kept. That would eliminate most of the article as it is, but better references need to be found. https://egr.vcu.edu/directory/mohamedgadelhak/ is a possible reference for basic info. I would like to get the article to a state where we can completely remove his resume and self-published website as references, as they are very clearly primary (and likely biased) sources. MrAureliusRTalk! 03:21, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
"Engineering scientist"
editReads odd to me in the lede—is this a recognized term? I (a layman) would expect "materials scientist" or "engineer", but not the current formulation. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 05:53, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
- It's something I've come across before, but not often, e.g. https://www.esm.psu.edu/academics/undergraduate/what-is-engineering-science.aspx -Kj cheetham (talk) 07:24, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Resume as source
editI really don't think his resume should be used as a source. It's completely written by him, and anything that isn't his original opinion should be instead supported by sources from elsewhere (ie, awards, publications, etc.). I keep meaning to come back and take a longer, harder look at this article and spend time cleaning it up but my time is so limited right now. Ideally I think his resume and anything written entirely by him about himself should be scrapped. MrAureliusRTalk! 03:21, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- Just noticed that the resume citation has "better source needed" attached, so that's at least a start. MrAureliusRTalk! 03:23, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- I've also been intending to come back and try to work on this article some. But I think the resume is fine for basic, presumed-non-controversial facts like birthday, undergraduate education, perhaps some basic career details. Anything approaching an assertion of notability should definitely have a RS; in this article, not all do. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 06:53, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Corrections in References 1 and 2 due to a defunct URL link
edit1. The links <www.people.vcu.edu/~gadelhak> in Reference 1---repeated 3 times---no longer work (it is now defunct). The correct links are <https://gadelhak.github.io/-gadelhak>,with hyphen - near the end not a tilde ~
2. The link <www.people.vcu.edu/~gadelhak/Resume.pdf> in Reference 2 no longer works. The correct link is <https://gadelhak.github.io/-gadelhak/Resume.pdf>
Same correction in the portrait area: Change <www.people.vcu.edu/~gadelhak> to <https://gadelhak.github.io/-gadelhak>
A plea to anyone of the Wikipedia volunteer editors to correct the errors, as I have a COI doing the corrections. Gadelhak (talk) 19:01, 8 February 2026 (UTC)
- Please respond to my request dated 8 February 2026. The requested change is a straightforward change of two URL's. Gadelhak (talk) 13:26, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
Corrections in References 1 and 2 due to a defunct URL link
edit| The user below has a request that an edit be made to Mohamed Gad-el-Hak. That user has an actual or apparent conflict of interest. The requested edits backlog is very high. Please be extremely patient. There are currently 533 requests waiting for review. Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies. |
Throughout the document,change <www.people.vcu.edu/~gadelhak> to <https://gadelhak.github.io/-gadelhak> and <www.people.vcu.edu/~gadelhak/Resume.pdf> to <https://gadelhak.github.io/-gadelhak/Resume.pdf>. Gadelhak (talk) 21:28, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
